The paper introduces a dataset of 10,015 real scam and spam phone calls collected over 53 days using an active voice‑agent honeypot. Each call is recorded, transcribed, and automatically labeled, yielding 328,869 turn‑level transcripts and 895 hours of audio from 5,665 distinct numbers. The corpus distinguishes between predatory‑but‑legal lead generation and outright scams, with labels validated by human review and technical checks on realism.
By Ethan Traister, Dennis Tsang Ng, Siyu Zhang, Huaiyu Guo, Tommy Duong, Tyler Wu, Yuchen Zhou, Xingyu Shen, Jiaqi Wu, Simiao Ren
arXiv:2607. 11707v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Following the rapid progress of generative Artificial Intelligence, there is a growing threat posed by conversational scams.
By Ahmed Omar Salim Adnan, Yogananda Manjunath, Shivanjali Khare
The study analyzes 10,211 real scam and spam calls collected by an AI voice‑agent honeypot, revealing that scammers operate on a templated, office‑hour schedule and use disposable numbers to recycle scripts. Callers predominantly seek identity anchors such as home addresses and dates of birth, and the amount of conversation increases with the target’s age, though the requested information remains unchanged. Early detection is feasible, with escalation predictability reaching 0.87 ROC‑AUC by the eighth line using simple bag‑of‑words models.
By Ethan Traister, Ankit Raj, Jiaqi Gan, Xingyu Shen, Tyler Wu, Yuchen Zhou, Tommy Duong, Kidus Zewde, Siying Chen, Simiao Ren
arXiv:2605. 01143v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM)-powered agents demonstrate strong capabilities in autonomous task execution, tool use, and multi-step reasoning.
By Sheldon Yu, Yingcheng Sun, Hanqing Guo, Qianqian Tong
The paper introduces the Agent Cross‑Layer Evidence (ACE) corpus, pairing application‑level telemetry with kernel‑level syscall traces to study agent security. It shows that kernel evidence alone is discriminative and that combining it with application‑level data outperforms either layer alone, revealing complementary signals. The study also demonstrates that this cross‑layer approach generalizes to unseen attack families and works across different agent runtimes.
By Spencer King, Zhilu Zhang, Mikhail Kuznetsov, Kay Liu, Baris Coskun, Wei Ding
arXiv:2607. 18826v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-agent defenses are typically evaluated one session at a time.
By SangJin Park, Myungsub Choi, Jineok Kim, Minseung Kang
arXiv:2606. 04141v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents often place sensitive credentials in the same context window as untrusted retrieved content, creating a direct path for indirect prompt injection to induce credential exfiltration.
By Kargi Chauhan, Pratibha Revankar
arXiv:2609.36879v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: As LLM-based agents perform increasingly complex tasks, Agent Skills have emerged as a flexible mechanism for extending their capabilities. An Agent...
By Haoran Ou, Gelei Deng, Xuanye Zhang, Wenbo Guo, Tianwei Zhang, Kwok-Yan Lam
arXiv:2609.14003v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Personal AI agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly given access to a user's private data and communications in order to provid...
By Minsun Shim, Ramisha Raida Karim, Ruthwik Jakkula, Kaiwen Zhou, Xin Liu, Xin Eric Wang, Zhou Li
arXiv:2606. 16100v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As Large Language Model (LLM) APIs become ubiquitous, users increasingly rely on black-box fingerprinting to verify that providers are serving the advertised premium models.
By Jiahao Zhang, Xiuyu Li, Suhang Wang
arXiv:2602. 06547v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-based coding agents increasingly rely on third-party extensions called skills, which bundle natural language instructions and helper scripts that execute with full user privileges.
By Yi Liu, Zhihao Chen, Yanjun Zhang, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, Jianting Ning, Leo Yu Zhang
arXiv:2503. 15560v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly vulnerable to sophisticated multi-turn manipulation attacks, where adversaries strategically build context through seemingly benign conversational turns to circumvent safety measures and elicit harmful or unauthorized responses.
By Prashant Kulkarni, Assaf Namer