arXiv Computation and Language

Which Medical Questions Deserve Rationales? Perturbation-Sensitive Selection for Robust QA

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

Beyond Information Seeking: Severity-Aware Question Supervision for Proactive Medical Dialogue

The paper introduces Expected‑Severity‑Risk (ESR), a new objective for selecting questions in proactive medical dialogue that prioritizes reducing the expected severity of diagnostic errors rather than merely uncertainty. ESR uses population statistics to marginalize over possible answers and distills its rankings into a prefix‑only language policy, enabling deployment without teacher‑side risk computation. Experiments on DDxPlus show ESR cuts high‑severity diagnostic misses by 29.5% and boosts accuracy while adding only 0.14 extra questions per dialogue.

By Chenxuan Li, Xinrong Chen, Luyan Zhang, Peidong Jia, Runfan Zheng, Zhongyu Zhao, Xuecheng Shang, Peixing Wan
arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago

TriageRA-CCF: Source-Side Clinical Confidence and Coverage Signals for Adaptive Rank Budgeting in Medical LLMs

The paper introduces TriageRA-CCF, a method for adaptively allocating low‑rank LoRA channels in medical large language models based on source‑side signals: answer confidence, clinical coverage, and a counterfactual close‑miss proxy. By supervising a budget router that selects among 2, 4, or 8 active ranks, the approach improves average accuracy over existing LoRA variants on Qwen3‑8B and Llama3.1‑8B, though gains vary across benchmarks. Ablation studies confirm that each signal contributes to better budget decisions, though their combined effect is not uniformly superior across all backbones.

By Shucan Ji, Yining Huang, Hongliang Guo
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Untangling the Mechanisms of Misleading Context in Medical Question Answering

The paper investigates how misleading context—specifically fabricated evidence and bare assertions—affects large language models’ medical question‑answering performance. Experiments on MedMisBench show that models are more prone to adopt answers based on assertions than fabricated evidence, and that these misleading cues are often disclosed in reasoning traces but rarely in final responses. A monitor that reads open reasoning traces can detect most corrupted decisions, whereas monitoring only responses is less effective.

By Robin Linzmayer, No\'emie Elhadad
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

ECGQuest: Benchmarking and Fine-Tuning Language Models for Electrocardiography

ECGQuest is a new benchmark that evaluates language models on the contextual knowledge required for electrocardiogram interpretation, featuring 10,904 True/False questions derived from 23 ECG references and 2003‑2025 Computing in Cardiology proceedings. The study tested 23 commercial and open‑source models, finding that zero‑shot accuracy ranged from 49.5% to 74.4% and that fine‑tuning with Low‑Rank Adaptation improved all open‑source models by 6.5–14.1%, with the best fine‑tuned model achieving 76.3% accuracy and a five‑model ensemble reaching 78.5%. ECGQuest demonstrates that parameter‑efficient fine‑tuning can enable smaller models to compete with larger commercial ones on ECG‑specific tasks.

By Mohammadsina Hassannia, Matthew A. Reyna, Reza Sameni