Hugging Face Trending Papers

EgoErrorVQA: Assess Egocentric Comprehension Capabilities through Procedural Errors for Ego-Agentic AI

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 26

EgoErrorVQA: Assess Egocentric Comprehension Capabilities through Procedural Errors for Ego-Agentic AI

EgoErrorVQA introduces a new egocentric visual question answering task that evaluates visual agents’ ability to detect procedural errors in everyday activities. The paper presents an evaluator agent built on the Agent2Agent protocol and shows that current models struggle with procedural error recognition. It also proposes Ego-ADR, an Adaptive Decoupled Reasoning framework that improves performance on the task, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results.

By Junlong Li, Junxi Li, Jianjun Gao, Chen Cai, Lap-Pui Chau, Yi Wang
arXiv AI
Jul 29

ProcAgent: An Agentic Framework for Procedural Task Guidance on Edge with Human-in-the-Loop

arXiv:2607. 24770v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Procedural tasks such as furniture assembly and home repair impose substantial cognitive demands because users must interpret instructions, track task progress, reason about spatial state, and recover from errors while performing physical actions.

By Azizul Zahid, Subrata Biswas, Bashima Islam, Sai Swaminathan
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

EgoArgus: Benchmarking VLMs as Situational Assistants for Modality-Grounded User Supports

EgoArgus is a new, human‑annotated dataset that tests visual‑language models (VLMs) as situational assistants in five everyday dialogue‑video scenarios. It evaluates how well VLMs understand and decide when to intervene, especially when visual and textual cues are helpful, irrelevant, or conflicting. The study finds that current VLMs still struggle to reliably act as egocentric assistants and that existing modality‑bias mitigation methods offer limited improvement.

By Yu-Chien Tang, Yu-Hsiang Liu, An-Zi Yen
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15

Self-Evolving Visual Questioner

arXiv:2606. 13929v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are typically trained as passive answerers, while their ability to actively ask diverse, non-trivial, visual-centric and grounded questions remains underexplored.

By Yijun Liang, Hengguang Zhou, Ming Li, Lichen Li, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Tianyi Zhou
arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago

Beacon: Knowing When and How to Perform Agentic Visual Reasoning

Beacon is a new agentic visual reasoning model that improves multimodal large language models (MLLMs) by better deciding when to use tools and how to use them. It introduces two key concepts—Mode Adaptiveness, which ensures tools are invoked only when necessary, and Tool Effect, which measures the net benefit of tool use— and trains the model with supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning that rewards necessity-aware decisions and expands capability through expert hints. Across 13 benchmarks, Beacon outperforms other open‑source models, achieving the highest average score and the largest net tool‑gain on diagnostic tests.

By Qixun Wang, Yang Shi, Letian Cheng, Zhuoran Zhang, Yan He, Yuqi Tang, Qi Zhang, Xinlei Yu, Ruizhe Chen, Tianrun Xu, Yuanxing Zhang, Pengfei Wan, Haotian Wang, Xianghua Ying
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Companion-style QA Assistance in Ego-Vision

BuddyVQA is a new benchmark for companion‑style question answering on egocentric streaming video, comprising 21.6K questions tied to 6K highlight moments across 1,012 long first‑person videos. It emphasizes two often overlooked aspects of daily first‑person QA: ego‑deictic expressions and interactively chained questions, requiring models to resolve visual pronouns and infer user intent within a long‑form streaming context. The authors propose MyBuddy, a multimodal chain‑of‑thought QA assistant that uses a question filter and multi‑level memory to efficiently retrieve visual and QA information, achieving significant performance gains on BuddyVQA and generalizing to other streaming and common video QA benchmarks.

By Hangyu Qin, Junbin Xiao, Shenglang Zhang, Angela Yao