The paper introduces a retrieval-augmented online textual memory for episodic memory video question answering, focusing on long egocentric videos. It evaluates how different retrieval units, query formulations, context budgets, and reranking strategies affect multiple-choice answering on QAEgo4D-Closed, keeping the generated memory fixed. The best configuration, Parent, matches strong baselines while exposing only a small fraction of the textual memory, and the study shows that better temporal coverage does not always improve accuracy, highlighting the need for evidence-aware representations.
By Raffaele Cali, Giuseppe Lando, Rosario Forte, Antonino Furnari
arXiv:2606. 05275v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the personal camera roll visual question answering setting.
By Thao Nguyen, Krishna Kumar Singh, Donghyun Kim, Yong Jae Lee, Yuheng Li
FocusGraph is a framework for selecting keyframes in egocentric long‑video question answering. It uses a lightweight Scene‑Graph LLM Selector to identify query‑relevant clips from graph‑based captions, then extracts keyframes with Patch‑wise Sparse‑Flow Retention (PSFR) before feeding them to a multimodal large language model for answer generation. The method achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on FindingDory and HourVideo while reducing question‑time inference cost.
By Tatiana Zemskova, Solomon Andryushenko, Ilya Obrubov, Viktoriia Khoruzhaia, Ekaterina Eroshenko, Ekaterina Derevyanka, Dmitry Yudin
arXiv:2604. 08342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long context egocentric video understanding has recently attracted significant research attention, with augmented reality (AR) highlighted as one of its most important application domains.
By Qiance Tang, Ziqi Wang, Jieyu Lin, Ziyun Li, Barbara De Salvo, Sai Qian Zhang
arXiv:2606. 29445v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video understanding is a fundamental capability for multimodal intelligence, and recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on Video Question Answering (VideoQA) benchmarks.
By Sunqi Fan, Qingle Liu, Runqi Yin, Meng-Hao Guo, Shuojin Yang
When should an intelligent assistant speak up without being asked? Continuous egocentric video offers rich, evolving context that enables a new form of assistance: one that is proactive rather than merely reactive.
arXiv:2607. 02959v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce VSeek, an agentic framework that transforms long-video question answering (LVQA) from a passive, single-pass perception task into a multi-turn retrieval process.
By Harsh Goel, S P Sharan, Sahil Shah, Minkyu Choi, Joungbin An, Kristen Grauman, Sandeep P. Chinchali
arXiv:2608. 04589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: EgoCross is a cross-domain egocentric video question answering benchmark designed to evaluate whether multimodal large language models can generalize beyond common daily-life scenarios.
By Yuqian Fu, Tianwen Qian, Yanjun Li, Yu Li, Kunyu Peng, Xu Zheng, Yongqin Xian, Alessio Tonioni, Yanwei Fu, Xiaoling Wang, Danda Paudel, Federico Tombari, Luc Van Gool, Leyi Wu, Yifan Zhao, Jinjie Zhang, Yinchuan Li, Yingcong Chen, Zixu Li, Zhiwei Chen, Zhiheng Fu, Wenbo Wang, Yupeng Hu, Weili Guan, Liqiang Nie, Takuya Murakawa, Toru Tamaki, Yi Wen, Zhenglin Du, Zhengyang Li, Lingling Li, Licheng Jiao, Wenping Ma
arXiv:2608. 12627v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-horizon egocentric memory transforms continuous first-person video and audio into a searchable record of past experiences.
By Le Zhang, Ke Sun
arXiv:2610.18499v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Egocentric video understanding spans diverse capabilities, modalities, and evaluation formats, yet these are often studied in isolation despite their...
By Songruo Chen, Yuqian Fu, Yu Li, Mingkang Dong, Sifan Zhou, Bin Ren, Xu Zheng, Tianwen Qian, Mohamed Elhoseiny, Yanwei Fu
arXiv:2607. 11523v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When should an intelligent assistant speak up without being asked?
By Gong Sitong, Tianyu Yan, Caixin Kang, Bo Zheng, Xiang Ruan, Huchuan Lu, Kaipeng Zhang, Yoichi Sato, Yifei Huang
EgoArgus is a new, human‑annotated dataset that tests visual‑language models (VLMs) as situational assistants in five everyday dialogue‑video scenarios. It evaluates how well VLMs understand and decide when to intervene, especially when visual and textual cues are helpful, irrelevant, or conflicting. The study finds that current VLMs still struggle to reliably act as egocentric assistants and that existing modality‑bias mitigation methods offer limited improvement.
By Yu-Chien Tang, Yu-Hsiang Liu, An-Zi Yen