arXiv Computer Vision By Junlong Li, Junxi Li, Jianjun Gao, Chen Cai, Lap-Pui Chau, Yi Wang

EgoErrorVQA: Assess Egocentric Comprehension Capabilities through Procedural Errors for Ego-Agentic AI

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

EgoErrorVQA introduces a new egocentric visual question answering task that evaluates visual agents’ ability to detect procedural errors in everyday activities. The paper presents an evaluator agent built on the Agent2Agent protocol and shows that current models struggle with procedural error recognition. It also proposes Ego-ADR, an Adaptive Decoupled Reasoning framework that improves performance on the task, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

arXiv AI
Jul 29

ProcAgent: An Agentic Framework for Procedural Task Guidance on Edge with Human-in-the-Loop

arXiv:2607. 24770v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Procedural tasks such as furniture assembly and home repair impose substantial cognitive demands because users must interpret instructions, track task progress, reason about spatial state, and recover from errors while performing physical actions.

By Azizul Zahid, Subrata Biswas, Bashima Islam, Sai Swaminathan
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

EgoArgus: Benchmarking VLMs as Situational Assistants for Modality-Grounded User Supports

EgoArgus is a new, human‑annotated dataset that tests visual‑language models (VLMs) as situational assistants in five everyday dialogue‑video scenarios. It evaluates how well VLMs understand and decide when to intervene, especially when visual and textual cues are helpful, irrelevant, or conflicting. The study finds that current VLMs still struggle to reliably act as egocentric assistants and that existing modality‑bias mitigation methods offer limited improvement.

By Yu-Chien Tang, Yu-Hsiang Liu, An-Zi Yen