arXiv AI

ID2Pattern: Pretraining Generalizable Identity Behavior Patterns for Transaction Risk Foundation Models

arXiv AI
Jul 21

Detection, Attribution, Narration: An End-to-End Pipeline for Explainable Money Mule Identification

arXiv:2607. 17586v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Money mule accounts are critical facilitators of financial fraud, yet detecting them at scale remains challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of transactional and behavioural data.

By Yuge Zhang, Yuanxing Zhang, Yichao Jin, Khairul Amsyar Mohd Razis, Nicholas Qi An Choo, Kai Yin Anders Wong, Xinyan Tang, Kenneth Zhu Ke, Wee Keong Dennis Lee, Jingyuan Zhao
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

PRAGMA: Revolut Foundation Model

arXiv:2604.08649v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern financial systems generate vast quantities of transactional and event-level data that encode rich economic signals. This paper present...

By Maxim Ostroukhov, Ruslan Mikhailov, Vladimir Iashin, Artem Sokolov, Andrei Akshonov, Vitaly Protasov, Andrey Goncharov, Dmitrii Beloborodov, Vince Mullin, Roman Yokunda Enzmann, Georgios Kolovos, Jason Renders, Pavel Nesterov, Anton Repushko
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

PersonaAgent: Retrieval-Augmented Transaction Anomaly Scoring with Refreshable Multi-Entity Persona Memory

PersonaAgent is a retrieval‑augmented transaction anomaly detection framework that stores the latest entity behavior signals as refreshable personas in memory. It updates these personas weekly via a batch job and, during inference, retrieves them with a lightweight adapter to augment a base anomaly classifier’s scoring. Benchmarks at Visa show that PersonaAgent can process 1,000 transactions in 1–2 ms while improving PR‑AUC by 0.65–6.58 % and production business metrics by 8.93–14.24 % relative to baseline models.

By Zhengyu Fang, Liang Wang, Yingtong Dou, Yuzhong Chen, Shubham Jain, Junpeng Wang, Xiran Fan, Menghai Pan, Jiarui Sun, Yan Zheng, Yiwei Cai
arXiv AI
Oct 21

TxnQA: Benchmarking Analytical Reasoning and Evidence Grounding over Transaction Event Sequences

TxnQA is a new analytical QA benchmark that tests reasoning and evidence grounding over transaction event sequences. It contains 27 task families with 81 templates and a 5‑scenario fraud‑risk reasoning suite built on synthetic, privacy‑mitigated transaction data. The benchmark evaluates models using format‑following rate, conditional content accuracy, and end‑to‑end correctness, revealing distinct bottlenecks in schema compliance, semantic calculation, and evidence attribution.

By Rabimba Karanjai, Yiming Bian, Yun-Shiuan Chuang, Jenna L. Ballard, Zijie Pan, Shivani Shekhar, Yixi Li, Yirou Ge, Avinash Thangali, Richard Williamson, Linsey Pang, Prakhar Mehrotra
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Identity Is More Than Recall: A Benchmark for Persistent Identity in Deployed AI Agents

The paper introduces PAI‑Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate persistent AI agents on how faithfully they adhere to a versioned identity contract. It separates several dimensions—recall, composition, behavioral enactment, resistance, persistence, lineage, and role‑conditioned updates—while keeping scoring oracles independent of the target process. Experiments on synthetic profiles show that explicit cues can significantly alter the presence of identity identifiers, revealing prompt‑dependent component selection and sensitivity to startup cues.

By Zhenyu Zhao, Roy Zhao
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

SR-Fraud: An Outcome-Supervised Reflective LLM Agent Framework for Non-Stationary Payment Fraud Detection

SR‑Fraud is a framework that uses a frozen, stateless LLM agent to score transactions in real time while an offline reflection agent proposes boundary hypotheses based on matured errors. The system then verifies these hypotheses deterministically before updating its knowledge state. On a production payment‑fraud benchmark, SR‑Fraud outperforms both static and periodically retrained CatBoost models and successfully detects an emerging fraud burst.

By Xuwei Tan, Yao Ma, Xueru Zhang
arXiv AI
3d ago

Mass Producing Training Data with Surprising Side Effects

The paper "Mass Producing Training Data with Surprising Side Effects" presents a method for automatically discovering datasets that cause unexpected side effects in language models. By defining three criteria—target behavior elicitation, ordinary appearance, and human surprise—the authors use LLM judges and search techniques to generate 6,575 datasets across eight behaviors. These datasets, which generalize across model families and sizes, provide a testbed for studying generalization and predicting training side effects before deployment.

By Yaowen Ye, Jacob Steinhardt, Sarah Schwettmann, Cassidy Laidlaw