arXiv:2601.08358v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Even though the ocean covers the majority of the planet's surface, it remains the least explored ecosystem. As light and radio waves do not propaga...
By Hilde I. Hummel, Sandjai Bhulai, Rob D. van der Mei, Burooj Ghani
arXiv:2609.13659v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition (UATR) of ships is well-suited for machine learning, yet its progress is hindered by the lack of large, divers...
By Connor Hashemi, Trevor Stout, Anthony Hoogs, Jason Parham
arXiv:2609.22586v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Modern audio-language models are no longer judged only on what words they can transcribe, but on whether they can reason over what they hear: recover...
By Harshit Rajgarhia, Asif Shaik, Rachuri Lokesh, Sushanta Kumar Pani, Abhishek Mukherji
The paper presents a compact underwater acoustic classification framework that integrates multi-representation feature engineering, temporal statistical pooling, and lightweight convolutional architectures for acoustic time-frequency and cochlear representations. Experiments on the ShipsEar dataset show a two-layer CNN achieving a macro F1 of 0.9918 and an RBF-SVM reaching 0.9883, but recording provenance issues limit verification of generalisation. When evaluated on the DeepShip dataset with recording-level partitioning, a 157K-parameter CNN attains a macro F1 of 0.7226, while a larger ResNet18 does not improve validation performance, underscoring the need for representation-aware design and rigorous evaluation for deployable systems.
By Abishek Soti, Thura Pyae Sone, Naqib Ibnul, Htoo Htet Aung, Henry Zhong, Gregory Cohen, Ying Xu
arXiv:2508.20976v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large audio-language models (LALMs) extend language understanding into the auditory domain, yet their ability to perform low-level listening,...
By Jaeyeon Kim, Heeseung Yun, Sang Hoon Woo, Chao-Han Huck Yang, Gunhee Kim
SEA-SpeechBench is a large‑scale multitask benchmark for speech understanding in 11 Southeast Asian languages, comprising 97,194 samples across 99 evaluation sets and 597 hours of curated audio. It covers nine tasks in three categories—speech processing, paralinguistic analysis, and a novel temporal understanding dimension—using multilingual prompting in both native SEA languages and English. Evaluation of current models shows significant performance gaps, especially in temporal understanding, emotion recognition, and speech translation, with low‑resource languages lagging behind English by up to 41 percentage points.
By Jingyi Liao, Wenyu Zhang, Zhuohan Liu, Yingxu He, Geyu Lin, Xunlong Zou, Shuo Sun, Syed Ali Redha Alsagoff, Ai Ti Aw
arXiv:2606. 02341v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Underwater acoustic classification has a wide array of oceanic applications, but faces challenges due to an increasingly complex acoustic environment.
By Amirmohammad Mohammadi, Joshua Peeples, Alexandra Van Dine
The paper introduces a symbiotic architecture that equips large language models with audio‑understanding abilities without fine‑tuning their weights. It uses an injector module to write audio‑conditioned vectors into the LLM’s key‑value cache, allowing the model to act as an audio language model while keeping the backbone unchanged. The approach improves scalability—since injection cost depends on the injector width—and preserves the LLM’s original text performance, outperforming conventional frozen‑LLM methods and approaching fine‑tuned ALM results on audio tasks.
By Yotaro Kubo, Qi Sun, Yujin Tang
Mizar is a 159.3‑million‑parameter audio‑language model designed for devices with limited memory and computation. It couples a compact CED‑Small audio encoder with SmolLM2‑135M via a frequency‑merging mapper and is trained in three stages—audio‑language alignment, audio‑dependent fine‑tuning, and post‑training—to improve performance on audio‑question tasks. Across five random seeds, Mizar outperforms all other sub‑200M‑parameter ALMs on MMAU, MMAR, and ADQA‑clean, achieving mean accuracies of 52.92%, 42.42%, and 36.02% respectively, while enabling local inference on a single CPU with an average latency of 1.09 seconds for MMAU questions.
By Kaiyang Li, Shaobo Han, Yue Tian, Shihao Ji
arXiv:2608. 19936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Public benchmarks are important measures of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) model capabilities.
By Theo Lebryk, David Ayllon, Alice Baird, Jakub Piotr C{\l}apa, Jens Madsen, Panagiotis Tzirakis
TontaubeV1 is a streaming text‑to‑speech model that preserves natural prosody while running on a single consumer GPU. It encodes speech with a hierarchical DualCodec representation at 12.5 Hz, separating a semantic stream from successive acoustic refinements, and uses Qwen3‑derived transformers to predict the semantic stream, utterance duration, and acoustic refinements. The system supports up to one minute of reference audio for voice conditioning, streams with a 200 ms latency to first audio, and achieves real‑time factors of 0.08 (single input) and 0.02 (eight concurrent inputs).
By Fritz Cremer, Jonathan Cremer
The paper investigates how to evaluate audio‑language models by separating the use of acoustic evidence from the need to invoke a generative audio model. Using a controlled call‑decision framework, the authors compare policies that rely on transcript labels, encoder outputs from CLAP, AST, or WavLM, and optional calls to generative models such as Qwen2‑Audio, Qwen2.5‑Omni, or MOSS‑Audio. Results on the VocalSound dataset show that while transcript‑only accuracy is low (0.296), encoder‑only controls achieve high accuracy (≈0.85) without any generative calls, and adding generative calls yields only a marginal improvement (0.925 vs. 0.921).
By Mengzhe Geng