arXiv AI

UA-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models on Underwater Acoustic Recognition

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Towards Deployable Underwater Vessel Classification

The paper presents a compact underwater acoustic classification framework that integrates multi-representation feature engineering, temporal statistical pooling, and lightweight convolutional architectures for acoustic time-frequency and cochlear representations. Experiments on the ShipsEar dataset show a two-layer CNN achieving a macro F1 of 0.9918 and an RBF-SVM reaching 0.9883, but recording provenance issues limit verification of generalisation. When evaluated on the DeepShip dataset with recording-level partitioning, a 157K-parameter CNN attains a macro F1 of 0.7226, while a larger ResNet18 does not improve validation performance, underscoring the need for representation-aware design and rigorous evaluation for deployable systems.

By Abishek Soti, Thura Pyae Sone, Naqib Ibnul, Htoo Htet Aung, Henry Zhong, Gregory Cohen, Ying Xu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

SEA-SpeechBench: A Large-Scale Multitask Benchmark for Speech Understanding Across Southeast Asia

SEA-SpeechBench is a large‑scale multitask benchmark for speech understanding in 11 Southeast Asian languages, comprising 97,194 samples across 99 evaluation sets and 597 hours of curated audio. It covers nine tasks in three categories—speech processing, paralinguistic analysis, and a novel temporal understanding dimension—using multilingual prompting in both native SEA languages and English. Evaluation of current models shows significant performance gaps, especially in temporal understanding, emotion recognition, and speech translation, with low‑resource languages lagging behind English by up to 41 percentage points.

By Jingyi Liao, Wenyu Zhang, Zhuohan Liu, Yingxu He, Geyu Lin, Xunlong Zou, Shuo Sun, Syed Ali Redha Alsagoff, Ai Ti Aw
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 28

Symbiotic Architecture for Post-Hoc Audio Extension of Frozen Language Models

The paper introduces a symbiotic architecture that equips large language models with audio‑understanding abilities without fine‑tuning their weights. It uses an injector module to write audio‑conditioned vectors into the LLM’s key‑value cache, allowing the model to act as an audio language model while keeping the backbone unchanged. The approach improves scalability—since injection cost depends on the injector width—and preserves the LLM’s original text performance, outperforming conventional frozen‑LLM methods and approaching fine‑tuned ALM results on audio tasks.

By Yotaro Kubo, Qi Sun, Yujin Tang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

Mizar: A 159M-Parameter Audio-Language Model for Audio Understanding

Mizar is a 159.3‑million‑parameter audio‑language model designed for devices with limited memory and computation. It couples a compact CED‑Small audio encoder with SmolLM2‑135M via a frequency‑merging mapper and is trained in three stages—audio‑language alignment, audio‑dependent fine‑tuning, and post‑training—to improve performance on audio‑question tasks. Across five random seeds, Mizar outperforms all other sub‑200M‑parameter ALMs on MMAU, MMAR, and ADQA‑clean, achieving mean accuracies of 52.92%, 42.42%, and 36.02% respectively, while enabling local inference on a single CPU with an average latency of 1.09 seconds for MMAU questions.

By Kaiyang Li, Shaobo Han, Yue Tian, Shihao Ji
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

TontaubeV1: Streaming Text-to-Speech with Hierarchical Codec Modeling and Bounded Context

TontaubeV1 is a streaming text‑to‑speech model that preserves natural prosody while running on a single consumer GPU. It encodes speech with a hierarchical DualCodec representation at 12.5 Hz, separating a semantic stream from successive acoustic refinements, and uses Qwen3‑derived transformers to predict the semantic stream, utterance duration, and acoustic refinements. The system supports up to one minute of reference audio for voice conditioning, streams with a 200 ms latency to first audio, and achieves real‑time factors of 0.08 (single input) and 0.02 (eight concurrent inputs).

By Fritz Cremer, Jonathan Cremer
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Auditing Generative Audio Calls for Known-Task Audio-LLM Evaluation

The paper investigates how to evaluate audio‑language models by separating the use of acoustic evidence from the need to invoke a generative audio model. Using a controlled call‑decision framework, the authors compare policies that rely on transcript labels, encoder outputs from CLAP, AST, or WavLM, and optional calls to generative models such as Qwen2‑Audio, Qwen2.5‑Omni, or MOSS‑Audio. Results on the VocalSound dataset show that while transcript‑only accuracy is low (0.296), encoder‑only controls achieve high accuracy (≈0.85) without any generative calls, and adding generative calls yields only a marginal improvement (0.925 vs. 0.921).

By Mengzhe Geng