arXiv:2609.31620v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Representation autoencoders (RAEs) reuse features from a pretrained visual encoder as reconstruction and diffusion latents, integrating strong visual r...
By Hongyang Du, Yunfei Xie, Junjie Ye, Jiawei Yang, Xiaoyan Cong, Haodong Zhang, Yongchao Huang, Haiyu Wu, Zongxia Li, Shihang Gui, Dawei Liu, Runhao Li, Jingcheng Ni, Chen Wei, Randall Balestriero, Yue Wang
arXiv:2610.03698v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Self-supervised Vision Transformers (ViTs), such as DINOv2, learn rich visual representations, but the functions of their internal tokens remain poorly...
By Neel Varma, Andrew Rufail, Dipika Khullar, Vasu Sharma
arXiv:2610.07729v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Visual tokens are a major source of inference cost in vision-language models, yet simple image downsampling remains a surprisingly strong compression b...
By Donghyun Han, Jangho Park, Yuseok Bae
arXiv:2610.00686v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent video-based world models pair the scalability of autoregressive (AR) prediction with the visual quality of diffusion models. The choice of scene...
By Mikhail Dereviannykh, Vikram Voleti, Simon Donne, Mallikarjun Byrasandra Ramalinga Reddy, Shimon Vainer, Mark Boss
arXiv:2609.39924v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision-language models face a fundamental scaling bottleneck: the number of visual tokens grows with both temporal duration and spatial resolution, m...
By Yulong Liu, Xiaotian Han, Junyuan Shang, Yuchen Ding, Zhenyu Zhang, Shuohuan Wang, Guibo Zhu, Sirui Han, Dianhai Yu
arXiv:2605.00809v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: In this paper, we present \textbf{Gen}erative \textbf{L}anguage-\textbf{I}mage \textbf{P}re-training (GenLIP), a minimalist generative pretraining...
By Yan Fang, Mengcheng Lan, Zilong Huang, Weixian Lei, Yunqing Zhao, Yujie Zhong, Yingchen Yu, Qi She, Yao Zhao, Yunchao Wei
Vision-language models commonly project all tokens produced by a pretrained vision encoder into a large language model. However, final-layer features can discard text, local attributes, and spatial relationships, while high-resolution inputs substantially increase context length and inference latency.
arXiv:2607.09086v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We present Subtoken Vision Transformer (SubViT), a selective image tokenization method for fine-grained visual recognition. Standard Vision Transfo...
By Jie Zhu, Ivy Zhang, Minchul Kim, Xiaoming Liu
arXiv:2610.17412v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Vision Transformers incur high computational costs when processing long visual token sequences. Existing reduction methods typically rank tokens inde...
By Xiaoya Tang, Shilong Liu, Daniel Smolyak, Xiwen Li, Quynh Nguyen, Tolga Tasdizen
LoopVAE introduces a recurrent depth architecture that reuses a scale‑ and loop‑conditioned core across different spatial scales while keeping resolution‑changing transitions separate. The four‑block core applies 28 block operations per encoder or decoder, enabling a 29M‑parameter convolutional model to achieve 0.28 rFID and 32.54 dB PSNR on ImageNet‑256 with roughly 65% fewer parameters than comparable VAEs. Experiments with both convolutional and Transformer operators, as well as ablations on parameter sharing, demonstrate competitive image quality metrics and reveal how targeted loop interventions and truncation affect reconstruction quality and computational trade‑offs.
By Zhiying Lu
arXiv:2610.19419v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: MLLM-based detectors formulate vision-language grounding as autoregressive coordinate generation, yet in dense scenes, they often collapse into a box r...
By Chenxu Wang, Hangyi Kuang, Bo-Wen Yin, Yuxuan Li, Quan-Sheng Zeng, Yang Zhang, Xu Guo, Xiang Li, Qibin Hou
The paper investigates how attention sparsity behaves in autoregressive image generation, finding a distinct diagonal sparsity pattern due to spatial locality of visual tokens. It introduces a diagonal‑aware sparse attention mechanism that skips KV entries along the diagonal within a recent window, achieving up to 3.1× higher throughput and 1.19× lower latency with less than 2% quality loss compared to dense inference.
By Daeun Kim, Junwha Hong, Changhun Oh, Yoonsung Kim, Yoonhyeong Lee, Jongse Park