arXiv:2609.36178v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a promising approach for training large language model agents. However, its uniform assignment o...
The paper introduces TASPO, a method that transforms privileged information (PI) into outcome‑grounded action credit for language‑model agents. TASPO constructs decision‑applicable PI from verified successful experience, aggregates PI‑induced likelihood shifts at the executable‑action level, and converts relative action support into positive, bounded, mean‑preserving weights on the original trajectory advantage. Experiments on three agentic benchmarks show TASPO improves over GRPO by 10.6% and generalizes better to unseen tasks, while reducing supervision mismatch and stabilizing policy optimization.
arXiv:2610.16027v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning improves tool-use agents, yet fine-grained credit assignment remains challenging even with step-level feedback. An observed er...
The paper introduces Effect-Marginal Policy Optimization (EMPO), a method that addresses credit-update misalignment in multi-turn reinforcement learning for large language model agents. EMPO aligns policy updates with execution-level equivalence by using an effect-level surrogate that couples updates across different textual responses that produce the same effect. Experiments on ALFWorld, WebShop, and Sokoban demonstrate that EMPO improves both task performance and learning efficiency compared to strong baselines.
arXiv:2606. 32017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning requires assigning credit to environment-facing actions such as searches, clicks, edits, navigation commands, and object interactions.
The paper introduces VICT, a method that leverages the internal structure of verifiable tasks to perform fine‑grained credit assignment for long‑horizon LLM agents. VICT exposes executable or evidence‑backed atoms from a task’s terminal verifier and traces them back to actions via dependency‑valid proof edges, redistributing advantage only along these edges. This approach improves performance on ALFWorld and WebShop compared to outcome‑only training and matches recent fine‑grained credit methods without requiring additional critics, labels, or inference‑time verifier access.
arXiv:2606. 01830v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent LLM search agents use reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) to learn search-augmented reasoning from outcome rewards.
The paper investigates whether a proximal policy optimisation (PPO) agent can learn to act as a broker in a continuous‑time broker‑trader game that has an analytically solved optimal strategy. By discretising the continuous‑time reward and validating the implementation, the authors show that a PPO agent with a feed‑forward neural network can approximate the reference action when there is no uninformed order flow, but struggles under stochastic uninformed flow, with critics failing to rank actions reliably. The study further demonstrates that a causal certainty‑equivalent controller based on observable history outperforms PPO under partial information, and that freezing the analytical policy and fine‑tuning PPO after a change in execution cost yields a measurable improvement. whyItMatters:"The analytical solution serves both as a diagnostic benchmark for RL performance and as a practical starting policy that can be adapted to changing market conditions, illustrating how theoretical finance models can guide and improve reinforcement learning in complex financial control tasks."
Contrastive Branch Policy Optimization (CBPO) is a reinforcement learning method that separates the allocation of a fixed rollout budget from the translation of branch outcomes into token-level credit. It uses generation entropy to screen branch positions, path- and node-level decay to distribute the budget, and Contrastive Branch Value (CBV) to estimate local decision sensitivity without changing reward signs. CBPO partitions trajectories into non-overlapping credit segments, preventing duplicated gradients and enabling fine-grained credit assignment using only outcome rewards.
arXiv:2610.08402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-turn LLM agents often receive sparse task feedback across several interactions, while generating each response token by token. This creates two r...
FARCA is a policy‑optimization framework that addresses the problem of noisy factual credit assignment in reinforcement learning for large language models. It transforms coarse factual supervision into token‑level training signals that are both localized and weighted by a reliability estimate derived from counterfactual evidence attribution. Experiments on several factual reasoning benchmarks show that FARCA improves model factuality while maintaining general reasoning abilities.
Revelation Control studies how to price interventions that reveal hidden state only when the revealed distinctions can alter a consequential decision, while separately accounting for any useful progress the intervention itself creates. The authors develop a framework for learning systems that defines decision‑sufficient revelation, revelation depth, and a cost‑adjusted factorization criterion, and they provide a target‑independent protocol for model‑specific instantiation. Experiments on Qwen2.5‑7B and Mistral‑7B‑v0.3 show that deeper future‑learning probes have positive decision value and that productive reuse yields strict equal‑compute utility advantages, supporting a structural transfer of the decision theory and evaluation protocol across architectures.