Revelation Control studies how to price interventions that reveal hidden state only when the revealed distinctions can alter a consequential decision, while separately accounting for any useful progress the intervention itself creates. The authors develop a framework for learning systems that defines decision‑sufficient revelation, revelation depth, and a cost‑adjusted factorization criterion, and they provide a target‑independent protocol for model‑specific instantiation. Experiments on Qwen2.5‑7B and Mistral‑7B‑v0.3 show that deeper future‑learning probes have positive decision value and that productive reuse yields strict equal‑compute utility advantages, supporting a structural transfer of the decision theory and evaluation protocol across architectures.
arXiv:2607. 29400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A routing decision can be revised at the next transaction, but a latched source exclusion persists across later decisions.
arXiv:2607. 13389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) post-training is increasingly used to adapt foundation models for reasoning, planning, and feedback-driven robot-learning pipelines, but constrained post-training resources are often summarized by a single total FLOP budget.
The paper presents a finite‑model synthesis that integrates operational state abstraction with optimal control within a stability‑evidence‑revision (SER) framework, termed "Poincaré meets Bellman." It distinguishes qualitative dynamics for reusable action‑response structures from dynamic programming that governs acquisition, retention, reuse, merging, and forgetting, and introduces a Bellman recursion over the joint law of hidden state and deployed memory. The authors derive explicit retention rules, demonstrate how factor sharing and informative observations improve identification, and verify coding and retention calculations through finite enumerations.
arXiv:2608. 01548v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Test-time emergence in LLM systems has a deployment boundary: additional computation can realize decisions already supported by the deployed information--execution structure, while evidence, tools, memory, and executable semantics can change the class inherited by later computation.
arXiv:2606. 30852v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning models spend different amounts of useful computation across instances, but it remains unclear when a learned stopping rule improves over simple confidence or convergence thresholds.
arXiv:2606. 30068v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Joint-embedding predictive (JEPA-style) objectives learn representations by predicting future latents.
arXiv:2607. 16858v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Across environments with mixed sources of uncertainty, unsupervised reinforcement learning requires intrinsic motivation that does not precommit to a particular direction of surprise.
arXiv:2608. 07725v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Average-reward reinforcement-learning regret is known up to logarithmic factors, but the numerical content of published guarantees is difficult to compare because probability mode, structural parameter, logarithmic normalization, prior information, and planning assumptions differ.
The paper proposes a method for selectively querying language‑model advice in reinforcement learning by predicting the value of potential responses and only querying when the expected benefit outweighs the cost. It introduces a certified, response‑contingent metareasoning framework that guarantees near‑optimal advice usage under certain assumptions, and demonstrates that a calibrated controller with Qwen2.5 advisors can improve task performance while drastically reducing the number of advice calls on the BabyAI benchmark.
The paper introduces the concept of causal retention in interactive agents, examining whether a frozen learned state can correctly answer a mechanism‑probe map that is fixed independently of training. It shows that for finite structural causal models the optimal probe error is a Bayes decision risk, vanishing only when each learning‑interface fiber lies within a single probe‑answer fiber, and provides theoretical results such as a posterior‑coverage theorem and an exact edit decomposition. Experiments on finite causal systems, continuous simulators, TD‑MPC2, and Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct demonstrate that causal retention can be achieved with high accuracy, outperforming task‑performance‑based approaches.
arXiv:2607. 16981v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An agent acting under partial observability must decide when to gather information and which observations are worth their cost.
The paper introduces loss‑conditioned state execution, a model‑agnostic technique that decides whether to apply a world model’s proposed state change or keep the current state based on whether the change reduces downstream loss. It formalizes state movability as the existence of a loss‑reducing feasible correction and constructs loss‑specific proposals from predictive distributions, executing them only when a groupwise lower confidence bound on loss improvement is positive. Experiments on forecasting and dynamics benchmarks show that the method accepts updates for a subset of cases, achieving lower bounded loss than persistence or always executing the proposal, and highlights that event predictability and loss‑based decisions must be evaluated separately.