arXiv:2607. 23273v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computational nutrition needs precise ingredient data, but current databases are incomplete, inconsistent, and built for human reference rather than automated reasoning.
By James Izzard, Hassan Eshkiki, Fabio Caraffini
arXiv:2606. 09556v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI Scientist agents are often evaluated as if capability were mainly a function of model quality, prompting, or reasoning scaffolds.
By Yinan Wang
arXiv:2607. 13618v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly evaluated on multi-week decision tasks in which the state that drives cost is never directly observed.
By Sagar Deb, Ashwanth Krishnan
arXiv:2606. 26185v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-as-judge ("grader") components are now standard in evaluation harnesses, including safety evaluations where a pass/fail verdict may gate downstream deployment decisions.
By Hiroki Tamba
arXiv:2607. 22067v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Competence claims for a language model in a safety-critical domain are credible when measured against a standard the domain already enforces.
By Isak Hwang, Yoon Pyo Lee, Syed Bahauddin Alam
arXiv:2607. 26313v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic systems act, so a defect in the evidence they retrieve becomes a wrong action with a currency cost.
By Gaston Besanson
arXiv:2607. 17417v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models confabulate chemical objects (molecular formulas, space groups, formation energies) in fluent reasoning traces, concentrated on long-tail entities where confidence is least trustworthy.
By Can Polat, Mustafa Kurban, Erchin Serpedin, Hasan Kurban
arXiv:2509. 01924v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agricultural decision-making faces a dual challenge: sustaining high yields to meet global food security needs while reducing the environmental impacts of input use, including fertilizer losses and other agrochemical applications such as herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides.
By Sakshi Arya, Wentao Lin
LLM agents are increasingly evaluated on multi-week decision tasks in which the state that drives cost is never directly observed. On such tasks the final cost cannot say why an agent failed: it may have misread the world, or read it correctly and still failed to act (the knowing-doing gap).
arXiv:2607. 23514v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal automated fact-checking (MAFC) verifies claims by retrieving and reasoning over external evidence.
By Haorui He, Xinwen Chen, Dacheng Wen, Reynold Cheng, Francis C. M. Lau, Yupeng Li
arXiv:2608. 05151v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wastewater operators need answers grounded in how their plant's variables interact and how fast effects propagate, not in generic pretraining text, when asking causal questions such as "why is N2O rising?
By Gary Simethy, Daniel Ortiz Arroyo, Petar Durdevic
arXiv:2608. 09254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM analytics agents are evaluated on SQL syntax accuracy, but production failures look different: questions with two valid business definitions, questions the warehouse cannot answer, deprecated columns after a schema change, and queries that execute successfully while returning the wrong business number.
By Morris Lee