arXiv AI

Choosing a Text Embedding Model: A Practical Benchmarking and Decision Framework

arXiv:2607. 23507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Choosing the right text embedding model is one of the most consequential -- and most frequently under-examined -- decisions in building a retrieval or search system, yet the model that tops a leaderboard is rarely the best choice for a given deployment.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

E2Rank: Unifying Text Embedding and Listwise Reranking for Effective and Efficient Search

E2Rank (Efficient Embedding-based Ranking) is a unified framework that extends a single text embedding model to perform both retrieval and listwise reranking. By treating the listwise prompt—constructed from the query and its top‑K candidates—as a pseudo‑relevance feedback query, E2Rank reranks via cosine similarity against precomputed document embeddings, avoiding costly autoregressive decoding. The approach achieves state‑of‑the‑art results on BEIR, competitive performance on the reasoning‑intensive BRIGHT benchmark, lower latency than existing LLM‑based rerankers, and improved embedding performance on MTEB—all within a single model.

By Qi Liu, Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Dingkun Long, Pengjun Xie, Jiaxin Mao
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 13

The Embedder's Dilemma: LLMs Are Better, but at What Cost?

Should you replace your text-embedding pipeline with a large language model? We answer this with a controlled, cost-aware comparison of ten LLMs across six families and 26 embedding models (118M to 14B parameters) on 37 tasks spanning classification, semantic textual similarity (STS), clustering, pair classification, and retrieval.

arXiv AI
Sep 18

Chunk Twice, Embed Once: A Systematic Study of Segmentation and Representation Trade-offs in Chemistry-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation

The study investigates how document segmentation and chunk representation affect retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for chemistry texts. Using the ChemQuests corpus, the authors benchmark 41 embedding models and evaluate them across five chunking strategies, seven chunk sizes, and various overlap settings. They find that embedding choice has the largest impact, with models like E5, BGE, and Nomic performing best, and recommend medium-to-large chunks with fixed-token, recursive-token, or hierarchical-section chunking and low overlap for effective chemistry-aware RAG.

By Mahmoud Amiri, Thomas Bocklitz
arXiv AI
Aug 19

DEPT: Document Embedding Preservation Tuning for Unified Query Expansion and Retrieval

The paper introduces DEPT, a method that trains a single decoder-only large language model to both expand queries and encode documents for retrieval. By preserving document embeddings close to their initial cached values while allowing gradients to flow through the generator, DEPT stabilizes retrieval targets and enables efficient index reuse and online hard‑negative mining. Experiments on the BEIR benchmark with Qwen3‑4B‑Instruct‑2507 and LLaMA‑3.2‑3B‑Instruct show that DEPT outperforms training‑free, independently trained, and staged unified baselines, with ablations confirming the benefits of preservation, whitening, end‑to‑end expansion training, and online negatives.

By Jingyuan Wang, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie, Mingxin Li, Yanzhao Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

KaLM-Reranker-V1: Fast but Not Late Interaction for Compressed Document Reranking

arXiv:2606.22807v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As retrieval systems scale, effective and efficient reranking becomes increasingly important. However, most existing encoder- and decoder-based rer...

By Xinping Zhao, Jiaxin Xu, Ziqi Dai, Xin Zhang, Huiyao Chen, Shouzheng Huang, Xianhao Xiong, Danyu Tang, Xinshuo Hu, Guohong Fu, Meishan Zhang, Baotian Hu