arXiv:2607. 23507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Choosing the right text embedding model is one of the most consequential -- and most frequently under-examined -- decisions in building a retrieval or search system, yet the model that tops a leaderboard is rarely the best choice for a given deployment.
By Madhav S Baidya
arXiv:2606.22807v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As retrieval systems scale, effective and efficient reranking becomes increasingly important. However, most existing encoder- and decoder-based rer...
By Xinping Zhao, Jiaxin Xu, Ziqi Dai, Xin Zhang, Huiyao Chen, Shouzheng Huang, Xianhao Xiong, Danyu Tang, Xinshuo Hu, Guohong Fu, Meishan Zhang, Baotian Hu
arXiv:2607. 03515v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In many machine learning applications, the most relevant items for a query should be efficiently retrieved.
By Kirill Shevkunov, Andrey Ploskonosov, Liudmila Prokhorenkova
Lychee‑Reranker is a fast, not‑late‑interaction reranker that decouples query and passage computation while preserving expressive relevance modeling. It uses an encoder–decoder architecture: passages are pre‑encoded with Matryoshka embedding pooling, and the decoder jointly processes system/user instructions and query intent, with cross‑attention capturing fine‑grained relevance. The design yields four benefits—offline passage encoding for efficiency, cross‑attention expressiveness, compact Matryoshka pooling, and adjustable test‑time compute—and is available in Nano, Small, and Large sizes (0.27B, 1B, and 4B activated parameters).
By Xinping Zhao, Jiaxin Xu, Ziqi Dai, Xin Zhang, Huiyao Chen, Shouzheng Huang, Xianhao Xiong, Danyu Tang, Xinshuo Hu, Guohong Fu, Meishan Zhang, Baotian Hu
As retrieval systems scale, high-quality reranking becomes increasingly important. However, most existing rerankers, whether encoder-based or decoder-based, jointly encode the query and passage, tightly coupling their computation and limiting deployment efficiency as well as flexibility.
arXiv:2606. 01070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense retrievers excel at first-stage candidate generation but lack effective reranking in zero-resource settings.
By Shiyan Liu, Yichen Li
arXiv:2604. 23336v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unlike traditional fact-based retrieval, rationale-based retrieval typically necessitates cross-encoding of query-document pairs using large language models, incurring substantial computational costs.
By Teng Chen, Sheng Xu, Feixiang Guo, Xiaoyu Wang, Qingqing Gu, Hongyan Li, Luo Ji
arXiv:2604.05087v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Generative large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as inference-time components in retrieval pipelines, for tasks such as query rewritin...
By Omri Uzan, Ron Polonsky, Douwe Kiela, Christopher Potts
DualView is an efficient dual‑view cascaded reranking framework designed for multi‑hop document reranking in question answering. It combines a Local Scorer that uses stacked cross‑attention for fine‑grained query‑document relevance with a Global Scorer that models inter‑document dependencies via Transformer‑based context aggregation. An Adaptive Gate dynamically fuses these views based on query semantics, achieving high recall and low latency on benchmarks such as MuSiQue.
By Litong Zhang, Jiaxin Li, Kuo Zhao
arXiv:2609.36359v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Graph-based approximate nearest neighbor search (ANNS) is widely used for large-scale semantic search. Its indices are constructed primarily based on g...
By Fangzhou Wu, Haike Xu, Sandeep Silwal
CORE improves compositional reasoning in multimodal language models by distilling a cross‑attentive reranker’s fine‑grained judgments into the embedding model. It generates candidate lists across five compositional matching levels and trains with a Rank‑KL objective to replicate the reranker’s ranking. Experiments on COLA, SUGARCREPE++, and NEGBENCH show CORE‑RERANKER‑8B outperforms Jina‑Reranker by 10.7 points, while CORE‑EMBED‑8B achieves the best overall average among evaluated embeddings, with gains also transferring to the MCMR benchmark without harming COCO or Flickr30K retrieval.
By Tingyu Song, Mingxin Li, Yanzhao Zhang, Dingkun Long, Chu Liu, Pengjun Xie, Yilun Zhao, Shu Wu
MERIT‑Rank introduces a multi‑trajectory reasoning framework for text reranking, combining complementary reasoning paths to enhance robustness against errors. It defines a Multi‑Trajectory Reasoning Space (MTRS) and a joint reranker that merges these perspectives into a single ranking decision. The Progressive Rank Policy Optimization (PRPO) training scheme stabilizes reasoning trajectories and progressively improves ranking quality, yielding superior performance on both reasoning‑intensive and traditional retrieval benchmarks, with a 4B model outperforming larger rerankers on BRIGHT.