arXiv AI

Combining Relevant Expert Knowledge Using Mixtures of Feedback Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

The paper proposes a method for combining expert knowledge using mixtures of feedback fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) guided by a relevance criterion adapted from legal evidence theory. An answer is deemed relevant only if it is both probative and material to the query, and this relevance is used to weight and mix expert FCMs into a query‑specific knowledge network. The authors introduce a Bayes‑like de‑mixing theorem to estimate posterior‑like FCMs and demonstrate the approach on synthetic FCMs derived from a 13‑node expert model of ischemic‑stroke risk.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

LLM Enhancement with Domain Expert Mental Model to Reduce LLM Hallucination with Causal Prompt Engineering

The paper proposes a causal prompt engineering framework that encodes a domain expert’s decision logic—termed an Expert Mental Model (EMM)—into large language models (LLMs) to mitigate hallucinations arising from missing knowledge. By formalizing factor formulation, factor monotonization, and monotonicity-preserving hierarchical structuring, the framework reduces the elicitation burden from millions of combinations to a manageable set, enabling a four-step EMM construction algorithm. The approach allows formal measurement of hallucination rates in tacit expert knowledge and is validated in grant proposal evaluation, cybersecurity design, and clinical diagnosis.

By Boris Kovalerchuk, Brent D. Fegley
arXiv AI
Jun 19

Navigating Unreliable Parametric and Contextual Knowledge: Explicit Knowledge Conflict Resolution for LLM Inference

arXiv:2606. 20245v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across a wide range of language-based tasks by leveraging both extensive parametric knowledge and in-context learning ability, enabling them to incorporate external information provided in the input prompt.

By Huang Peng, Jiuyang Tang, Weixin Zeng, Hao Xu, Xiang Zhao
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

Quantitative Evidence Mining for Plausibility-Aware Biomedical AI: A Narrative Review and Conceptual Framework

The article proposes a framework called quantitative evidence mining to transform biomedical findings into structured, context-rich evidence units. It outlines core elements such as claim, measured entity, value, comparator, population, conditions, temporal context, uncertainty, provenance, validation, and expert review. The authors present an eight-stage reference architecture and emphasize that plausibility should remain multidimensional rather than collapsed into a single truth label, linking extraction to evidence synthesis for applications like clinical trials, biomarker research, and knowledge-graph construction.

By Negin Sadat Babaiha, Stefan Geissler, Marie-Christine Simon, Martin Hofmann-Apitius, Marc Jacobs
arXiv AI
Aug 21

MKG-CARE: Case-Aware Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge Graphs for Explainable Medical Image Diagnosis

arXiv:2605. 22547v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Medical image diagnosis has achieved significant progress with deep learning, yet existing methods often rely on isolated visual evidence and lack the ability to effectively leverage similar cases and external knowledge.

By Yiming Xu, Yixuan Liu, Yuhang Zhang, Ling Zheng, Yihan Wang, Qi Song
arXiv AI
Aug 5

When Many Answers Are Valid, Voting Fails: Symbolic Verification for Best-of-K Causal Reasoning in LLMs

arXiv:2608. 03506v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-consistency assumes the most frequent answer among sampled reasoning traces is the most reliable, but this can fail in causal reasoning: samples often repeat the same confounding error, and votes fragment across multiple valid answers, letting an invalid answer win despite a valid minority trace.

By Omatharv Bharat Vaidya, Connor Thomas Jerzak, Zayne Rea Sprague, Fangcong Yin, Nhat Ho
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

When Many Answers Are Valid, Voting Fails: Symbolic Verification for Best-of-K Causal Reasoning in LLMs

Self-consistency assumes the most frequent answer among sampled reasoning traces is the most reliable, but this can fail in causal reasoning: samples often repeat the same confounding error, and votes fragment across multiple valid answers, letting an invalid answer win despite a valid minority trace. We introduce CALVER (Causal Axiom-Level VERification), a training-free symbolic verifier that scores structured traces against Pearl's causal criteria, including -separation, backdoor adjustment, and intervention, and selects the highest-scoring candidate without consulting a reference answer.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

LEGO: Synergizing Expert GraphRAG and Expert Chain-of-Thought for Legal Reasoning

LEGO is a dual‑module framework that combines a Legal Expert GraphRAG system with an expert Chain‑of‑Thought approach to enhance complex legal reasoning. The GraphRAG component uses an expert‑annotated civil code graph and a greedy normative‑coverage retrieval algorithm to extract relevant provision subgraphs, while the Chain‑of‑Thought module structures retrieved provisions and case facts into a Provision‑Fact‑Conclusion reasoning flow. Using a Qwen3‑8B backbone, LEGO achieves 40.53% exact‑match accuracy on LawExamQA_Civil, surpassing baseline RAG and CoT models and matching larger models on multi‑hop and open‑ended benchmarks, with ablation studies confirming the complementary benefits of both modules.

By Qingjing Chen, Junkai Zhang, Shaochun Wang, Jiahao Ding, Siyuan Zheng, Yukun Yan, Zhi Zheng, Antonino Rotolo, Yun Liu, Weixing Shen