arXiv:2606. 15656v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern artificial intelligence remains fundamentally divided between the continuous, probabilistic spaces of Foundation Models and the discrete, deterministic structures of Knowledge Graphs.
The paper introduces a neuro‑symbolic framework for constructing knowledge graphs (KGs) that are grounded in an ontology. It combines open‑domain extraction, embedding‑based canonicalization of types and predicates, and a post‑extraction LLM‑based correction step to fix ontology violations, thereby reducing token usage and improving KG consistency. The resulting KGs support symbolic querying, as evidenced by the prevalence of SPARQL graph patterns in the extracted data.
arXiv:2607. 14149v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Although large language models (LLMs) have set benchmarks for zero-shot reasoning, their deployment remains cost-prohibitive and environmentally taxing.
arXiv:2606. 03307v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph foundation models (GFMs) emerged as a dominant paradigm in graph representation learning by leveraging large-scale pre-training for cross-domain inference.
arXiv:2607. 10212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are increasingly constructed through automated extraction pipelines; however, such systems often introduce spurious or incomplete triples, which degrade downstream performance.
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are increasingly constructed through automated extraction pipelines; however, such systems often introduce spurious or incomplete triples, which degrade downstream performance. Existing evaluation practices rely heavily on task-specific metrics or small-scale manual verification, offering limited insight into the structural and semantic fidelity of extracted graphs.
arXiv:2506.05626v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Real-world knowledge can take various forms, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. Among these, Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are...
arXiv:2605. 22093v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Knowledge graphs have become the primary vehicle for data integration and are critical to the success of modern AI, but the diversity of KG modelling practices, from lightweight vocabularies to richly axiomatised ontologies, makes integration and reuse expensive and brittle.
The paper presents a framework and results of a multi-dimensional analysis of GPTKB v1.5, a 100‑million‑fact knowledge base elicited from GPT‑4.1. It shows that the LLM’s factual knowledge differs markedly from established knowledge bases and that its accuracy is lower than suggested by prior benchmarks. The study also identifies inconsistency, ambiguity, and hallucinations as major issues, pointing to future research directions in neuro‑symbolic AI for extracting, consolidating, and verifying factual LLM knowledge.
arXiv:2606. 03705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are widely used to mitigate the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as outdated knowledge and hallucinations.
arXiv:2607. 22633v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Table Question Answering (TableQA) aims to reason over tables to answer user queries.
The paper introduces TOFU, a token-based foundation model for multi‑modal knowledge graph reasoning (MMKGR). TOFU converts structural, visual, and textual data into modality‑specific tokens and uses a hierarchical fusion architecture with mixture‑of‑message mechanisms to learn transferable features. Experiments on 17 MMKGs demonstrate that TOFU outperforms existing KGFM and MMKGR baselines, especially on unseen knowledge graphs.