arXiv:2608.29856v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used as scalable evaluators for open-ended tasks. However, many LLM judges derive query-specific criteria during...
By Yifan Chen, Haitao Li, Qingyao Ai, Fengbin Zhu, Tat-Seng Chua, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu
arXiv:2608.16831v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Pretrained large language models offer a practical foundation for learning useful behavior from few task-specific examples. We argue that current p...
By Minh-Ha Nguyen, Ngoc-Ngo Quang Tran, Thuy Dung Nguyen, Cathy Shyr
arXiv:2609.24480v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in healthcare requires robust performance across two complementary dimensions - diagnostic reasoning: the conv...
By Kalash Shah, Kunal Singh, Snehan J, Shreyas Singh
arXiv:2606. 18203v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The LLM-empowered personal health agents with user health (sensor) metrics have offered a promising pathway to alleviate global disparities in healthcare access.
By Weizhi Zhang, Zechen Li, Hamid Palangi, Ben Graef, A. Ali Heydari, Simon A. Lee, Salman Rahman, Ray Luo, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Erik Schenck, Chloe Zhang, Yamin Li, Menglian Zhou, Philip S. Yu, Daniel McDuff, Lindsey Sunden, Mark Malhotra, Shwetak Patel, Ahmed A. Metwally
PotARCin expands the ARC benchmark by evaluating abstract reasoning across five dimensions—Definition, Classification, Constrained Generation, Editing, and Inversion—using programmatic generation of new task instances. The study shows a 25‑52 percentage‑point performance gap between standard ARC evaluation and PotARCin, and reveals that multi‑dimensional assessment can reorder models that appear equivalent under single‑metric accuracy. Additionally, a new held‑out set, P‑ARC, demonstrates low model accuracy (1‑8%) across all dimensions, highlighting the need for more comprehensive tests of abstract reasoning.
By Claas Beger, Ryan Yi, Melanie Mitchell
SkillLift introduces a method for efficiently evolving reusable procedural prompts (skills) in large language model agents by learning a dense rubric that aligns with sparse oracle evaluations. Instead of directly revising skill text based on costly full agent rollouts, the approach decouples skill search from oracle cost through a bilevel optimization framework: an inner loop uses a frozen rubric as a cheap surrogate to guide skill updates, while an outer loop periodically realigns the rubric using a small number of oracle rollouts via rank correlation. Experiments on complex agent task benchmarks demonstrate that SkillLift outperforms existing auto-skill methods while reducing token cost by 40–70% compared to frontier-evolving approaches.
By Haoxiang Kang, Ming Wen