arXiv AI

Ablation, Statistical Inference, and Validation for KV-Cache Compression

arXiv:2607. 09683v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study systematically compares Turbo-Quant and SpectralQuant KV-cache compression, evaluating non-dominated schemes, including WHT rotation with Beta Lloyd-Max and QJL, through a statistical validation methodology that separates systematic codec differences from implementation variance.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3

The risk of KV cache compression

arXiv:2607. 01520v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformer inference on long sequences is expensive because softmax attention repeatedly reads from a large KV cache.

By Lukas Haverbeck, Carmen Amo Alonso, Andres Felipe Posada-Moreno, Sebastian Trimpe, Marco Pavone
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 7

Quality Recovery for Quantized KV Caches via Low-Rank Attention Adaptation

The paper investigates how to recover language model quality lost when using low‑bit key–value caches for autoregressive decoding. By keeping the quantizer fixed and distilling the full‑precision cache behavior into low‑rank Q/K/V projection updates, the authors demonstrate that 4‑bit affine‑cache adapters recover roughly 54 % of the perplexity gap on TinyLlama‑1.1B and 76 % on Gemma‑4‑12B, while preserving most long‑context retrieval. Even a 2‑bit rank–token sweep can dramatically reduce TinyLlama’s perplexity, though it only partially restores retrieval performance.

By Seifeldin Abdellatif
arXiv AI
Jul 8

Benchmarking KV-Cache Optimizations across Task Quality and System Performance for Long-Context Serving

arXiv:2607. 05399v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model serving is increasingly limited by KV-cache growth under long-context workloads, yet existing KV-cache compression techniques are difficult to compare because they were evaluated on different models, tasks, budgets, and serving stacks.

By Nikita Agrawal, Ruben Mayer