arXiv:2606. 26437v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing metrics for factuality and faithfulness evaluate whether an answer is supported or contradicted by its grounding documents, but they fail to capture when both supporting and contradicting evidence coexist.
By Siyi Liu, Aaron Halfaker, Dan Roth, Patrick Xia
arXiv:2606. 18060v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Model based agents enter autonomous scientific research, their ability to resist pseudoscience becomes increasingly important.
By Xinyang Liao, Lingyu Li, Huacan Liu, Tianle Gu, Yang Yao, Tong Zhu, Yan Teng, Yingchun Wang
arXiv:2208. 11582v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The wide spread of false information online, including misinformation and disinformation, has become a major problem for our highly digitised and globalised society.
By Haiyue Yuan, Enes Altuncu, Shujun Li, Can Baskent, Jason R. C. Nurse
arXiv:2606. 12618v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robust lie detectors for language models could enable powerful techniques for auditing, monitoring, and post-hoc investigation of model behaviour, but evaluating them requires testbeds where models verifiably believe the opposite of what they say.
By Alan Cooney, David Africa, Geoffrey Irving
arXiv:2608. 12852v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language can describe states of affairs that are false and states of affairs that could not be the case at all.
By Yoon Pyo Lee
arXiv:2607. 14152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The persuasive power of data visualizations can go awry: for instance, in an explainable AI (XAI) context, visualizations can produce over-trust of predictive models.
By Michael Correll, Lucy Havens, Mahsan Nourani
arXiv:2606. 10852v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM deception is often evaluated through direct markers such as fabricated claims, explicit lies, or strategic concealment.
By Polydoros Giannouris, Mohsinul Kabir, Sophia Ananiadou
arXiv:2607. 09668v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ground truth datasets play a fundamental role as reference values in the training and evaluation of machine learning models.
By Charlotte H\"ogberg, Ericka Johnson, Kiri L. Wagstaff
arXiv:2608. 03627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for automated fact-checking, yet their susceptibility to gender bias in this context remains underexplored.
By Razieh Chalehchaleh, Reza Farahbakhsh, Noel Crespi
arXiv:2601. 05050v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be persuasive across a variety of contexts.
By Thomas H. Costello, Kellin Pelrine, Matthew Kowal, Jasper Timm, Antonio A. Arechar, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Godbout, Adam Gleave, David Rand, Gordon Pennycook
arXiv:2606. 17478v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLMs acquire stronger reasoning capabilities, deceptive behavior becomes an increasingly serious safety concern.
By Kexin Chen, Yi Liu, Haonan Zhang, Yanhui Li, Xinyu Deng, Dongxia Wang
arXiv:2608. 08881v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The current work developed seven Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models based on leading deception theories and compared how deception judgments were made relative to baseline models.
By David M. Markowitz, Timothy R. Levine