arXiv:2510. 03243v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Efficient scheduling of large language model (LLM) inference tasks is critical for achieving low latency and high throughput, a challenge that is becoming increasingly acute with the rise of reasoning-capable LLMs whose generation lengths are highly variable.
By Yiheng Tao, Yihe Zhang, Matthew Dearing, Xin Wang, Yuping Fan, Michael E. Papka, Zhiling Lan
arXiv:2504. 11320v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models now serve millions of users daily, with providers incurring costs exceeding $700,000 per day.
By Ruicheng Ao, Gan Luo, David Simchi-Levi, Xinshang Wang
Diffusion language models (dLLMs) generate text by iteratively denoising a masked response and can commit multiple output positions per model invocation. Their bidirectional attention prevents exact autoregressive-style KV caching, since committing one position shifts the KV activations of all others.
arXiv:2608. 06557v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The reasoning and agentic capabilities of large language models have expanded the range of applications they support, from short interactive exchanges to long, compute-heavy requests.
By Muhammad Adnan, Rohan Mahapatra, Prashant J. Nair, Daniel Berger, Pantea Zardoshti, Rodrigo Fonseca, Esha Choukse
arXiv:2607. 04206v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion language models (dLLMs) generate text by iteratively denoising a masked response and can commit multiple output positions per model invocation.
By Nitin Kedia, Saurabh Agarwal, Myungjin Lee, Aditya Akella
GroupKV is a lightweight hierarchical KV cache management system designed for long‑context diffusion large language model (dLLM) inference. It partitions the context into contiguous groups and uses coarse‑to‑fine sparse selection, cross‑layer consistency for predictive prefetching, and a staleness correction mechanism to keep the cache coherent amid dynamic KV updates. The approach also incorporates streaming prefill to lower peak memory usage, achieving up to 48× longer serviceable context, 3.73× faster inference in offload‑based settings, and competitive task accuracy.
By Jinhao Wang, Zhexin Hu, Kangjie Zhou, Xin Zhou, Fangfang Liu
arXiv:2609.17193v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-powered agentic AI services increasingly demand low-latency inference, motivating the deployment of LLMs across distributed...
By Zhen Li, Jun Cai, Haoran Gao, An Li, Tan Li
arXiv:2412. 04504v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) grow in popularity for their diverse capabilities, improving the efficiency of their inference systems has become increasingly critical.
By Ozgur Guldogan, Jackson Kunde, Kangwook Lee, Ramtin Pedarsani
The paper introduces the Denoising Workload Surface (DWS), a two‑dimensional probability surface that captures the block‑autoregressive generation structure of diffusion large language models (dLLMs). By preserving both output block and within‑block denoising step information, DWS enables a lightweight, prompt‑only predictor to estimate per‑request inference cost accurately, even on a single CPU core. In real‑world serving experiments, DWS reduces cost‑prediction error by up to 2.5× and improves end‑to‑end latency for online chatbots by up to 1.92×.
By Haoyu Zheng, Fangcheng Fu, Binhang Yuan, Yongqiang Zhang, Liang Deng, Hao Wang, Yuanyuan Zhu, Xiao Yan, Jiawei Jiang
arXiv:2606. 18431v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM serving exhibits extreme length variability, making size-based scheduling difficult in practice.
By Yueying Li, Yuanfan Chen, Jiayang Chen, Esha Choukse, Haoran Qiu, G. Edward Suh, Rodrigo Fonseca, Ziv Scully, Udit Gupta
arXiv:2606. 26666v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoregressive large language model (LLM) serving is increasingly limited by key-value (KV) cache movement rather than dense matrix multiplication.
By Muhammad Ahmed
TeDiServe is a cluster‑level serving system designed for diffusion language models (DLMs). It addresses DLM‑specific challenges such as the speed‑quality tradeoff from confidence‑based denoising, variable parallelization under fluctuating load, and non‑uniform per‑step costs from approximate KV caching. By employing deadline‑aware scheduling, adaptive load control, and a quality‑aware optimization for cluster reconfiguration, TeDiServe achieves up to 56.6 percentage points higher SLO attainment and reduces end‑to‑end latency by up to 46% with less than 1% accuracy loss.
By Tzu-Tao Chang, Benjamin Yuanyang Hong, Kiet Pham, Shivaram Venkataraman