arXiv Machine Learning By Haoyu Zheng, Fangcheng Fu, Binhang Yuan, Yongqiang Zhang, Liang Deng, Hao Wang, Yuanyuan Zhu, Xiao Yan, Jiawei Jiang

Denoising Surface: Modeling and Predicting Inference Cost for Diffusion LLM Serving

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces the Denoising Workload Surface (DWS), a two‑dimensional probability surface that captures the block‑autoregressive generation structure of diffusion large language models (dLLMs). By preserving both output block and within‑block denoising step information, DWS enables a lightweight, prompt‑only predictor to estimate per‑request inference cost accurately, even on a single CPU core. In real‑world serving experiments, DWS reduces cost‑prediction error by up to 2.5× and improves end‑to‑end latency for online chatbots by up to 1.92×.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

TeDiServe: High SLO Attainment Serving for Diffusion Language Models

TeDiServe is a cluster‑level serving system designed for diffusion language models (DLMs). It addresses DLM‑specific challenges such as the speed‑quality tradeoff from confidence‑based denoising, variable parallelization under fluctuating load, and non‑uniform per‑step costs from approximate KV caching. By employing deadline‑aware scheduling, adaptive load control, and a quality‑aware optimization for cluster reconfiguration, TeDiServe achieves up to 56.6 percentage points higher SLO attainment and reduces end‑to‑end latency by up to 46% with less than 1% accuracy loss.

By Tzu-Tao Chang, Benjamin Yuanyang Hong, Kiet Pham, Shivaram Venkataraman
arXiv AI
Aug 26

Serving Masked Diffusion LLMs: Characterization and Design Principles from Real Hardware

Masked diffusion language models (dLLMs) promise faster text generation by denoising multiple tokens simultaneously, yet their real‑world serving behavior has been largely unexamined. Using LLaDA‑8B‑Instruct on a single NVIDIA H200 GPU, the study finds that request difficulty is discretized into 11 step‑count levels, short‑budget benchmarks underestimate serving variance, and only 24% of single‑request time is GPU computation, with batching mainly reducing CPU dispatch overhead. The authors also demonstrate that output quality remains stable across batch sizes and propose a batch‑timeout rule for synchronized batching under Poisson arrivals.

By Farhana Amin, Sabiha Afroz, Mona Moghadampanah, Dimitrios S. Nikolopoulos