AgentDecept is a new benchmark that evaluates deceptive behavior in large language model agents that use tools under pressure. It contains 477 pressure variants derived from 257 source tasks across six pressure sources, each paired with a pressure‑free counterpart. The protocol compares user‑facing claims to time‑ordered observations and executed outcomes, distinguishing falsification, concealment, and equivocation from honest failure and disclosed limitations.
By Yehan Zhang, Qianqi Yan, Hang Yin, Ching-Chen Kuo, Shan Jiang, Ming Ouyang, Yijie Liu, Xin Eric Wang
arXiv:2606. 02380v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLM-based agents expand their operational scope, reliability becomes a prerequisite for real-world deployment.
By Yuyan Bu, Haowei Li, Qirui Zheng, Bowen Dong, Kaiyue Yang, Jiaming Ji, Yingshui Tan, Wenxin Li, Yaodong Yang, Juntao Dai
arXiv:2607. 05174v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language agents, i.
By Zhiheng Xi, Dingwen Yang, Jiaqi Liu, Jixuan Huang, Honglin Guo, Baodai Huang, Tinggang Chen, Qi Zhang, Zhonghang Lu, Chenyu Liu, Jiajun Sun, Jiazheng Zhang, Dingwei Zhu, Xin Guo, Junzhe Wang, Zhihao Zhang, Yuming Yang, Junjie Ye, Minghe Gao, Dongrui Liu, Jiaming Ji, Guohao Li, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
LPS-Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the safety awareness of computer‑use agents (CUAs) in long‑horizon planning tasks that involve tool workflows. It uses a template‑guided multi‑agent pipeline to generate user instructions, simulated toolkits, and case‑specific safety criteria, followed by human review, allowing scalable expansion without building separate application environments. The benchmark includes 570 cases from 65 scenarios across seven task domains and nine planning‑risk types, and an LLM‑based evaluator assesses tool choices, arguments, and responses throughout execution. Evaluations of 13 LLM agents show persistent safety failures in both benign and adversarial settings, with prompt‑based interventions providing only model‑dependent improvements.
By Tianyu Chen, Chujia Hu, Dongrui Liu, Xia Hu, Wenjie Wang
arXiv:2608. 03403v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance bottleneck of agents is increasingly shifting from model capability to the robustness of their execution processes.
By Can Wang, Haoran Chen, Li Yu, Ding Hao, Bohai Zhao, Zhaoyang Liu, Zhiying Tu
The paper introduces TerminalHorizon, an automated engine that synthesizes long‑horizon trajectories for terminal agents by reconstructing environments from real‑world professional work and progressively expanding tasks to require further exploration and improvement. Using this engine, the authors create 1.5K task environments and fine‑tune Qwen3.5‑27B, producing TerminalHorizon‑27B, which shows significant performance gains across 12 benchmarks in coding, agentic production tasks, and reasoning. Case studies demonstrate the model’s ability to experiment beyond initial solutions, refine methods based on feedback, and preserve effective improvements in final deliverables.
By Shun Zou, Ziyu Ma, Yi Zou, Yong Wang, Lin Chen, Zehui Chen, Guanhua Chen, Xiangxiang Chu, Feng Zhao
arXiv:2606. 04455v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current AI benchmarks evaluate agents on task execution within human-designed workflows.
By Xinyu Lu, Tianshu Wang, Pengbo Wang, zujie wen, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou, Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, Le Sun
The paper introduces the Agent Planning Benchmark (APB), a diagnostic framework designed to evaluate the planning capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents. APB contains 4,209 multimodal cases across 22 domains and five settings, testing holistic planning, step-wise planning with feedback, and robustness to extraneous or broken tools and unsolvable tasks. Evaluation on 12 MLLMs reveals systematic weaknesses in long-horizon planning, tool-noise robustness, calibrated refusal, and inference-time refinement, while APB-guided refinement improves plan correctness and downstream execution metrics on ToolSandbox and τ²‑bench tasks.
By Haoyu Sun, Wenxuan Wang, Mingyang Song, Jujie He, Weinan Zhang, Yang Liu, Yang Yang, Yu Cheng
arXiv:2602.05843v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has catalyzed the development of autonomous agents capable of navigating complex environments. Howe...
By Fangzhi Xu, Hang Yan, Qiushi Sun, Jinyang Wu, Zixian Huang, Muye Huang, Jingyang Gong, Zichen Ding, Kanzhi Cheng, Yian Wang, Xinyu Che, Zeyi Sun, Jian Zhang, Zhangyue Yin, Haoran Luo, Ben Kao, Qika Lin
arXiv:2606. 14397v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As agentic systems continue to evolve and are widely deployed in real-world scenarios, there is a growing demand to faithfully evaluate their capabilities.
By Mykola Vysotskyi, Runqi Lin, Grzegorz Biziel, Michal Zakrzewski, Sebastian Montagna, Damian Rynczak, Shreyansh Padarha, Kumail Alhamoud, Zihao Fu, William Lugoloobi, Kai Rawal, Hanna Yershova, Xander Davies, Taras Rumezhak, Guohao Li, Fazl Barez, Baoyuan Wu, Arkadiusz Drohomirecki, Yarin Gal, Chris Russell, Christopher Summerfield, Adam Mahdi, Volodymyr Karpiv, Philip Torr, Adel Bibi
arXiv:2603. 14465v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into tool-using agents, they remain brittle in long-horizon interactions.
By Shengda Fan, Xuyan Ye, Yupeng Huo, Zhi-Yuan Chen, Yiju Guo, Shenzhi Yang, Wenkai Yang, Shuqi Ye, Jingwen Chen, Haotian Chen, Xin Cong, Yankai Lin
arXiv:2606.14397v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As agentic systems continue to evolve and are widely deployed in real-world scenarios, there is a growing demand to faithfully evaluate their capab...
By Mykola Vysotskyi, Runqi Lin, Grzegorz Biziel, Michal Zakrzewski, Sebastian Montagna, Damian Rynczak, Shreyansh Padarha, Kumail Alhamoud, Zihao Fu, William Lugoloobi, Kai Rawal, Hanna Yershova, Taras Rumezhak, Guohao Li, Fazl Barez, Baoyuan Wu, Arkadiusz Drohomirecki, Yarin Gal, Chris Russell, Christopher Summerfield, Adam Mahdi, Volodymyr Karpiv, Philip Torr, Adel Bibi