Terminal‑RSI is a new framework for terminal agents that alternates Recursive Self‑Rewrite (RSR) of verified trajectories with Recursive Policy‑Refine (RPR) that inherits a critic. It introduces TB‑GAE for token‑specific baselines, Family Dense Reward (FDR) and Success‑Prioritized Reward (SPR) to calibrate progress, and uses a warm‑up critic, recursive handoff, and stage‑specific learning rates to coordinate the two refinement phases. The five‑stage pipeline applied to Qwen3.8‑27B produces Terminal‑RSI‑27B, achieving 19.84 % on Terminal‑Bench 4.0, 86.52 % on Terminal‑Bench 2.1, 16.95 % on Terminal‑Bench 3.0, and 79.00 % on Terminal‑Bench Hard, while improving process reward and strict completion on LHTB.
arXiv:2608. 05466v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-quality long-horizon training data for terminal agents is expensive to produce, often costing hundreds to thousands of dollars per task, because each task must keep the instruction, environment, reference solution, and verifier mutually consistent.
arXiv:2609.27532v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon agentic tasks require an agent to modify an environment through a sequence of tool calls, with success determined by the final state. The...
The paper introduces Actor‑Critic with Action Chunking (AC2), a method that assigns credit to short action chunks instead of entire trajectories, enabling policy updates without waiting for terminal rewards. AC2 employs local readiness, reference solutions, and 10k‑token chunks to make critic‑based credit assignment reliable. Experiments on Qwen3‑4B with FineProofs‑RL show AC2 surpasses GRPO’s peak validation score while using 2.5× fewer decoding FLOPs and fewer training steps.
arXiv:2608.21501v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Credit assignment in large-language-model reinforcement learning (LLM RL) can be separated into three objects: evidence about success, a transport oper...
arXiv:2610.15840v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language model (LLM) agents remains challenging in long-horizon tasks with sparse outcome rewards, where assign...
CAFE (Coupled Agent–Feedback Evolution) is a framework that lets a shared‑parameter model alternate between acting as a search agent and as a critic that provides corrective feedback. By learning when to request feedback and how to use it, CAFE trains the agent to recover from its own failures and shapes rewards both online and offline. Experiments on seven search benchmarks show that CAFE outperforms other RL‑based agents, maintains gains on out‑of‑domain tests, and reduces hallucinations, indicating that co‑evolving feedback is essential for self‑improving search agents.
The paper introduces T1, a 122‑billion‑parameter Mixture‑of‑Experts model trained with reinforcement learning to perform long‑horizon terminal tasks such as coding and scientific discovery. T1 operates a real shell in a cloud sandbox, making over 300 tool‑call turns per task and receiving rewards from task‑specific verifiers. The authors detail a training recipe that includes aggressive warm‑starting, TITO construction with drift repair, and rollout‑routing replay, achieving significant performance gains on Terminal‑Bench 2.1 and surpassing GPT‑5.4 and GLM‑5.1 on the Long‑Horizon Terminal Bench.
arXiv:2608.30406v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning struggles with long horizons when rewards are sparse. While a planner can provide subgoals to guide a low-level...
arXiv:2609. 03241v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A reasoning model can improve from its own on-policy experience, but this inner loop is fragile: terminal verifiers provide reliable yet sparse supervision, while dense same-model guidance can reinforce false confidence or overconcentrate learning on a narrow solution mode.
arXiv:2610.08402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-turn LLM agents often receive sparse task feedback across several interactions, while generating each response token by token. This creates two r...
arXiv:2607. 03702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents have shown strong decision-making capabilities in long-horizon interactive tasks, yet they still struggle to effectively leverage failed trajectories: full retries incur high interaction costs, while experience retrieval tends to dilute critical experience signals.
The paper introduces Recuris, a recursive Experiential‑Working Memory architecture that lets long‑horizon agents track task progress and select skills based on current needs rather than full history. By coupling working memory with experiential memory, execution becomes structured evidence that localizes failures to specific memory components, enabling a bounded recursive memory‑evolution loop. Across four benchmarks and ten models, Recuris improves task success in 35 of 37 model‑benchmark pairs, raising state‑of‑the‑art performance on tau‑bench and SkillFlow and reducing common long‑horizon failures by up to 80%.