arXiv:2606. 09401v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work has applied differential privacy (DP) to adapt large language models (LLMs) for sensitive applications, offering theoretical guarantees.
The paper introduces a rank‑aware exponential mechanism that privatizes listwise preference data for large language model alignment under local differential privacy. By sampling a fixed‑size binary partition, the method concentrates noise near borderline items rather than uniformly across all items, thereby reducing sensitivity. Experiments demonstrate that this approach outperforms existing LDP baselines on downstream alignment tasks while maintaining the same privacy budget.
arXiv:2606. 28479v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: CSIRTs increasingly fine tune language models on vulnerability scan records, but these records expose internal network topology and create privacy risks under regulations such as GDPR and LGPD.
arXiv:2606. 10481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) can exhibit problematic memorization of individual training examples.
arXiv:2610.27213v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personalized large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on profile-conditioned inference, pairing public requests with rich, user-specific facts....
The paper introduces a new privacy vulnerability in diffusion language models (DLMs) called token‑level memorization asymmetry, derived from theoretical analysis of diffusion training dynamics. It proposes Q‑Skew, a quantile‑weighted skewness indicator, to perform membership inference on fine‑tuned DLMs, outperforming existing baselines across multiple datasets and models. Additionally, Q‑Skew can be used to extract personally identifiable information (PII), demonstrating a broader privacy attack surface.
The study investigates how users perceive the helpfulness and privacy-preservation of large language model (LLM) responses in privacy-sensitive scenarios. Using 94 participants and 90 PrivacyLens scenarios, researchers found that users’ evaluations of identical LLM outputs varied widely, whereas five proxy LLM judges showed high agreement but low correlation with user judgments. The results suggest that proxy LLMs cannot reliably estimate users’ diverse perceptions of utility and privacy, highlighting the need for more user-centered evaluation methods.
arXiv:2608. 09164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human privacy preferences requires capturing individuals' disclosure boundaries beyond general privacy norms.
arXiv:2607. 16620v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) is increasingly deployed to limit membership inference risk in machine-learning systems.
arXiv:2410. 06814v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Over-parameterized models are typically vulnerable to membership inference attacks, which aim to determine whether a specific sample is included in the training of a given model.
arXiv:2510. 04773v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities learned from vast corpora, concerns regarding data privacy and safety are receiving increasing attention.
arXiv:2606. 05004v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the widespread deployment of public large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, protecting user prompt privacy has become an increasingly critical issue.