arXiv:2605. 07482v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine unlearning for large language models (LLMs) aims to selectively remove memorized content such as private data, copyrighted text, or hazardous knowledge, without costly full retraining.
By Zizhao Hu, Ameya Godbole, Johnny Tian-Zheng Wei, Mohammad Rostami, Jesse Thomason, Robin Jia
arXiv:2609.38929v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Machine learning systems increasingly face the need to remove the influence of entire data domains, such as toxic language, harmful behavior, or topica...
By Pinaki Mohanty, Haoran Tang, Maggie Makar, Rajiv Khanna
arXiv:2507. 04219v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current unlearning methods for LLMs optimize on the private information they seek to remove by incorporating it into their fine-tuning data.
By Yan Scholten, Sophie Xhonneux, Leo Schwinn, Stephan G\"unnemann
arXiv:2507. 19894v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With the rapid advancement of generative models, privacy, copyright, safety, and reliability risks have attracted growing attention.
By Xiaohua Feng, Jiaming Zhang, Fengyuan Yu, Chengye Wang, Li Zhang, Kaixiang Li, Yuyuan Li, Lingjuan Lyu, Chaochao Chen, Jianwei Yin
Large Language Models (LLMs) can memorize and reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or otherwise undesirable training content, creating privacy, safety, and regulatory concerns. Machine unlearning offers...
The paper identifies a problem in large language model (LLM) unlearning called forget‑set misalignment, where the set of data to be forgotten does not match what the model has actually memorized. Two failure modes are described: Under Unlearning, where memorized information is omitted from the forget set, and Out‑of‑Knowledge Unlearning, where the algorithm attempts to forget knowledge the model never learned, harming performance. The authors propose CONfs, a data‑blind framework that constructs model‑aligned forget sets by eliciting the model’s memorized knowledge, and demonstrate that it achieves near‑gold standard forgetting while preserving utility better than other data‑blind methods.
By Miso Kim, Georu Lee, Seungwon Jeong, Woojin Lee