The paper introduces VoxPrivacy, a benchmark for assessing interactional privacy in Speech Language Models (SLMs). It evaluates models on a 32‑hour bilingual dataset across three difficulty tiers, revealing that most open‑source SLMs perform near random on conditional privacy decisions and even strong closed‑source systems struggle with proactive privacy inference. The authors also validate these findings on a real‑speech subset and show that fine‑tuning on a 4,000‑hour training set can improve privacy‑preserving capabilities while maintaining robustness.
By Yuxiang Wang, Hongyu Liu, Dekun Chen, Xueyao Zhang, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv:2608.30141v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Preference optimization is widely used to align large language models with human preferences, but preference-data composition may also influence priv...
By Dishu Yang, Jingjing Liu, Jize Li
arXiv:2601. 03546v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate decision-making tasks involving personal data sharing, where privacy concerns and prosocial motivations can push choices in opposite directions.
By Guanyu Chen, Chenxiao Yu, Xiyang Hu
arXiv:2608.28833v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While Large language models (LLMs) incorporate user personalization signals to improve usability and helpfulness, they increasingly shift from providin...
By Yumeng Wang, Yuchen Wu, Cheng Qian, Zhiyuan Fan, Hyeonjeong Ha, Shujin Wu, Jiayu Liu, Heng Ji, Ge Wang
The paper introduces the concept of personalized privacy for large language models, allowing user‑specific disclosure preferences to guide information sharing. It presents P3Bench, a benchmark that extends contextual privacy policies with personalized rules, and shows that existing prompt‑based methods often ignore these policies. To improve compliance, the authors propose “Repair”, an inference‑time attention head intervention that aligns model responses with user‑specific privacy rules.
By Junseok Kim, Nakyeong Yang, Kyomin Jung
arXiv:2607. 22695v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generalizing human language for the completion of never-before-seen tasks, leading to widespread deployment.
By Ryan Thornton, Mir Mehedi Ahsan Pritom, Maanak Gupta
The paper systematically studies how anonymizing input data affects large language models (LLMs). Five prominent LLMs were evaluated on eleven benchmarks, comparing performance on original versus pseudonymized inputs. Results show that anonymization generally degrades performance, with larger drops for more capable models and task-dependent effects; reversible anonymization preserves entity uniqueness better than irreversible redaction, and prompting about anonymization offers no benefit.
By Tobias Deu{\ss}er, Max Hahnb\"uck, Lorenz Sparrenberg, Tobias Uelwer, Christian Bauckhage, Rafet Sifa
arXiv:2606. 09908v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are becoming widely deployed as personal AI assistants with access to sensitive user data, making privacy a major challenge for their design and evaluation.
By Ayana Hussain, Soumya Sharma, Golnoosh Farnadi, Nicholas Vincent, H\'eber Hwang Arcolezi, Ulrich A\"ivodji
arXiv:2608. 05246v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing personalized LLM benchmarks primarily rely on textual personas or isolated behavioral signals, providing limited evaluation of cross-domain behavioral personalization, where responses must be grounded in heterogeneous daily-life activities.
By Jiahao Zhang, Yongzhi Tong, Zelin Fu, Pengde Zhao, Yanmei Jiang, Jiang Feng, Min Yang
Large Language Models (LLMs) raise growing concerns about privacy leakage and copyright compliance. Membership inference is a key tool for assessing such risks, but existing studies mainly focus on whether specific samples or sample-based data units are used for training.
arXiv:2606. 05004v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the widespread deployment of public large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, protecting user prompt privacy has become an increasingly critical issue.
By Peihua Mai, Xuanrong Gao, Youlong Ding, Xianglong Du, Wei Liu, Yan Pang
arXiv:2602. 12394v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personalized prompting offers large opportunities for deploying large language models (LLMs) to diverse users, yet existing prompt optimization methods primarily focus on task-level optimization while largely overlooking user-specific preferences and latent constraints of individual users.
By Yuchen Ma, Yue Huang, Wenjie Wang, Xiaonan Luo, Xiangliang Zhang, Stefan Feuerriegel