arXiv:2609.24372v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In-context learning (ICL) based on large language models (LLMs) has shown promising potential in alleviating performance bottlenecks caused by the limi...
By Jingyu Wang, Shijie Wu, Fusheng Jin
arXiv:2609.14652v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) applications often transfer domain concepts into the model's context informally, through prompt prose, schema dumps, and e...
By Blake G. Fitch
arXiv:2508.14323v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Tool-augmented LLMs invoke external functions to extend their capabilities, but errors in the invocation decision, such as calling a tool when none...
By Yixin Chen, Ying Xiong, Shangyu Wu, Yufei Cui, Xue Liu, Nan Guan, Chun Jason Xue
arXiv:2607. 25718v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on invoking external tools to complete real-world tasks.
By Xinyi Hong, Pinjun Dong, Xinyang Yu, Binyan Jiang
The paper introduces EXYGEN, a framework that enables conversational access to large knowledge graphs by combining VoID descriptions, ShEx schemas, retrieved triples, and example question‑query pairs in a retrieval‑augmented generation pipeline. On the SciQA benchmark, this approach achieves an exact‑match score of 0.419 without fine‑tuning any large language model, and shows that larger general‑purpose LLMs can outperform smaller code‑specialized ones when provided sufficient context. To scale metadata generation for very large KGs, the authors propose a predicate‑coverage‑aware parallel graph sampling strategy that preserves structural diversity, reduces runtime by over 80× on OpenCitations Meta and GESIS, and is the only tractable method for obtaining complete metadata on ORKG.
By Harshdeep Singh, Yurui Zhu, Giovanni Colavizza, Matteo Romanello
The paper presents an end‑to‑end pipeline for automatically constructing a tree‑structured knowledge graph (KG) from Vietnamese high school history textbooks and evaluating retrieval strategies that exploit the KG’s hierarchical structure. The KG construction uses a three‑phase hybrid relation extraction process, including intra‑batch deduplication, approximate cross‑batch search, and LLM extraction with a centroid filter and dual‑LLM validator, resulting in 750 nodes and 4,341 semantic edges across 41 ontology types. Retrieval evaluation compares three graph traversal strategies—Top‑Down, Horizontal, and Bottom‑Up—on a benchmark of 1,210 Vietnamese queries, finding that the Top‑Down strategy with structural information outperforms a vector baseline by 4.7 percentage points in NDCG@10.
By Ket Doan Nguyen, Minh N. H. Nguyen