arXiv:2409. 17754v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) emerges as a distributed machine learning approach that addresses privacy concerns by training AI models locally on devices.
By Diego Cajaraville-Aboy, Ana Fern\'andez-Vilas, Rebeca P. D\'iaz-Redondo, Manuel Fern\'andez-Veiga
arXiv:2606. 06687v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate cluster formation, involving the number and composition of clusters, in decentralized federated learning (FL) with heterogeneous machine learning (ML) optimizers.
By Su Wang, Mung Chiang, H. Vincent Poor
arXiv:2607. 28338v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clustered Federated Learning (CFL) addresses data heterogeneity in federated settings by grouping clients with similar data distributions to enable effective training.
By Michael Ben Ali, Imen Megdiche, Andr\'e P\'eninou, Olivier Teste
arXiv:2608. 14654v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative paradigm that enables multiple devices to train a global model while preserving local data privacy.
By Hai Anh Tran, Cuong Ta, Truong X. Tran
arXiv:2606. 30499v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning often suffers under non-independently and identically distributed data, where a single global model may fail to represent the diversity of client distributions.
By Davide Domini, Gianluca Aguzzi, Ivana Dusparic, Danilo Pianini, Mirko Viroli
arXiv:2607. 08368v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the widespread deployment of basic models in edge intelligence, communication bandwidth has become a core bottleneck restricting the scalability of federated learning.
By Lingyu Qiu, Daniela Annunziata, Stefano Izzo, Fabio Giampaolo, Francesco Piccialli
The paper proposes a new federated learning approach called FedALS that reduces communication costs by varying aggregation frequencies across model layers. It derives tighter generalization bounds for one‑round and multi‑round federated learning, linking these bounds to local updates and data heterogeneity. Based on representation‑learning insights, the authors argue that infrequent aggregation of early layers and more frequent aggregation of final layers yields more generalizable models, especially in non‑iid settings, and demonstrate the method’s effectiveness experimentally.
By Peyman Gholami, Hulya Seferoglu
arXiv:2608. 09208v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Decentralized intelligence systems with heterogeneous devices and limited coordination increasingly rely on decentralized federated learning (DFL).
By Van Truong Vo, Khoa Nguyen, Taehong Kim
arXiv:2607. 04254v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Over-the-air (OTA) aggregation exploits the superposition property of wireless multiple-access channels to aggregate model updates from multiple devices within a single transmission slot, significantly reducing communication latency.
By Kaushal Attaluri, Rebeca P. Diaz-Redondo, Manuel Fernandez Veiga
arXiv:2505. 09854v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As end-user device capability increases and demand for intelligent services at the Internet's edge rises, distributed learning has emerged as a key enabling technology for the intelligent edge.
By Harikrishna Kuttivelil, Katia Obraczka
arXiv:2608. 01426v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables distributed optimization and learning across decentralized edge devices while preserving data privacy, but its performance is fundamentally constrained by heterogeneous data distributions, limited communication resources, and energy availability.
By Furkan Bagci, Busra Tegin, Mohammad Kazemi, Tolga M. Duman
With the widespread deployment of basic models in edge intelligence, communication bandwidth has become a core bottleneck restricting the scalability of federated learning. Although one-shot federated learning alleviates this problem by minimizing communication rounds, existing iterative fine-tuning or knowledge distillation methods still face challenges such as high server-side computational costs and hyperparameter sensitivity.