arXiv:2605. 21115v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for managing electric vehicle (EV) battery data in intelligent transportation systems (ITS), enabling privacy-preserving tasks such as anomaly detection and capacity estimation.
By Mouhamed Amine Bouchiha, Abdelaziz Amara Korba, Yacine Ghamri-Doudane
arXiv:2608.21137v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Decentralized Federated Learning (DFL) promises trust-free collaborative learning by replacing the centralized parameter server with peer-to-peer model...
By Mouhamed Amine Bouchiha, Gregory Blanc, Yufei Han
arXiv:2608. 01095v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables multiple intelligent devices to collaboratively train a high-accuracy model without sharing raw data.
By Hongliang Zhang, Zhongyuan Yu, Fenghua Xu, Teng Hu, Jian Meng, Jiguo Yu
The paper proposes Byrd-NAFL, a Byzantine‑robust federated learning algorithm that incorporates Nesterov’s momentum and resilient aggregation rules. It achieves fast and safe convergence under non‑convex, smooth loss functions with relaxed gradient assumptions, and provides a finite‑time convergence guarantee. Experiments show that Byrd-NAFL outperforms existing methods in convergence speed, accuracy, and resilience to various malicious attacks.
By Lihan Xu, Xiaoyi Fan, Gang Wang, Runhao Zeng, Xiping Hu, Yanjie Dong
arXiv:2606. 05701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The increasing adoption of distributed infrastructure systems, cloud computing, Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, and edge-based architectures has significantly expanded the cybersecurity attack surface and introduced increasingly sophisticated cyber threats.
By Md. Arifur Rahman, B. M. Taslimul Haque, Md. Iqbal Hossan, Md. Serajul Kabir Chowdhury Rubel
The paper reviews the state of robustness in Federated Learning (FL), highlighting its vulnerability to performance degradation, data theft, and aggregation attacks. It presents a comprehensive framework that includes a threat-centric view of attack surfaces, a taxonomy of robust aggregation methods (distinguishing outcome‑centric from security‑centric approaches), and a layered taxonomy of defensive strategies. The authors also scrutinize current evaluation practices and outline key applications and open research challenges to steer future work.
By Pravija Raj P V, Ashish Gupta, Andrea Augello, Sajal K. Das
arXiv:2606. 04388v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as an effective paradigm for collaborative intelligence while preserving data privacy.
By Muhammad Hadi, Muhammad Jahangir, Talha Shafique, Muhammad Khuram Shahzad
The paper investigates how adversarial examples transfer between client models in federated learning and explores the relationship between these examples and client data distributions. It proposes a defense strategy based on adversarial training that leverages the transferability of model robustness. Experiments on real-life datasets demonstrate that the new attack and defense methods outperform existing state‑of‑the‑art approaches.
By Zuobin Xiong, Deval Mukherjee, Homook Cho, Wei Li
arXiv:2609.07312v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: This paper proposes a robust decentralized personalized federated learning method R-DPFL, that enables clients to reduce the impact of Byzantine attack...
By Xiao Ma, Hong Shen, Hui Tian, Wenqi Lyu, Wei Ke
The development of federated learning (FL) techniques has helped improve the privacy preservation of users' data and extended the applications of machine learning models. However, the involvement of a...
arXiv:2606. 27622v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Byzantine-robust federated learning seeks to protect distributed model training from malicious or corrupted clients without requiring access to their private data.
By Emmanuel Rassou, Tomas Gonzalez
The paper introduces a robust decentralized federated distillation approach that allows heterogeneous client models to collaborate using predictions on shared unlabeled public data. Each client evaluates received predictions across three modalities—class prediction, boundary decision, and prediction correlation—filters unreliable clients, assigns reliability-based weights, and constructs modality-specific teachers. The method validates distillation gradients against supervised gradients from private data, removes conflicting gradients, and proves convergence under Byzantine attacks, achieving improved accuracy on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 under non‑IID data and malicious conditions.
By Xiao Ma, Hong Shen, Hui Tian, Wei Ke, Wenqi Lyu