arXiv AI

Byzantine-Robust Aggregation for Securing Decentralized Federated Learning

arXiv:2409. 17754v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) emerges as a distributed machine learning approach that addresses privacy concerns by training AI models locally on devices.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18

Automated Byzantine-Resilient Clustered Decentralized Federated Learning for Battery Intelligence in Connected EVs

arXiv:2605. 21115v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for managing electric vehicle (EV) battery data in intelligent transportation systems (ITS), enabling privacy-preserving tasks such as anomaly detection and capacity estimation.

By Mouhamed Amine Bouchiha, Abdelaziz Amara Korba, Yacine Ghamri-Doudane
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

A Nesterov-Accelerated Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning

The paper proposes Byrd-NAFL, a Byzantine‑robust federated learning algorithm that incorporates Nesterov’s momentum and resilient aggregation rules. It achieves fast and safe convergence under non‑convex, smooth loss functions with relaxed gradient assumptions, and provides a finite‑time convergence guarantee. Experiments show that Byrd-NAFL outperforms existing methods in convergence speed, accuracy, and resilience to various malicious attacks.

By Lihan Xu, Xiaoyi Fan, Gang Wang, Runhao Zeng, Xiping Hu, Yanjie Dong
arXiv AI
Jun 6

Cognitive Threat Intelligence and Explainable Federated Security Analytics for distributed Infrastructure Systems

arXiv:2606. 05701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The increasing adoption of distributed infrastructure systems, cloud computing, Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, and edge-based architectures has significantly expanded the cybersecurity attack surface and introduced increasingly sophisticated cyber threats.

By Md. Arifur Rahman, B. M. Taslimul Haque, Md. Iqbal Hossan, Md. Serajul Kabir Chowdhury Rubel
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Upholding Robustness in Federated Learning: Trends, Emerging Strategies, and Research Opportunities

The paper reviews the state of robustness in Federated Learning (FL), highlighting its vulnerability to performance degradation, data theft, and aggregation attacks. It presents a comprehensive framework that includes a threat-centric view of attack surfaces, a taxonomy of robust aggregation methods (distinguishing outcome‑centric from security‑centric approaches), and a layered taxonomy of defensive strategies. The authors also scrutinize current evaluation practices and outline key applications and open research challenges to steer future work.

By Pravija Raj P V, Ashish Gupta, Andrea Augello, Sajal K. Das
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Rethinking the Transferable Adversarial Attacks and Robust Defense in Federated Learning

The paper investigates how adversarial examples transfer between client models in federated learning and explores the relationship between these examples and client data distributions. It proposes a defense strategy based on adversarial training that leverages the transferability of model robustness. Experiments on real-life datasets demonstrate that the new attack and defense methods outperform existing state‑of‑the‑art approaches.

By Zuobin Xiong, Deval Mukherjee, Homook Cho, Wei Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Robust Decentralized Federated Distillation via Multi-Modality Knowledge Collaboration

The paper introduces a robust decentralized federated distillation approach that allows heterogeneous client models to collaborate using predictions on shared unlabeled public data. Each client evaluates received predictions across three modalities—class prediction, boundary decision, and prediction correlation—filters unreliable clients, assigns reliability-based weights, and constructs modality-specific teachers. The method validates distillation gradients against supervised gradients from private data, removes conflicting gradients, and proves convergence under Byzantine attacks, achieving improved accuracy on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 under non‑IID data and malicious conditions.

By Xiao Ma, Hong Shen, Hui Tian, Wei Ke, Wenqi Lyu