arXiv:2606. 05609v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed, identifying their vulnerability through jailbreak attacks becomes increasingly critical.
By Seungwon Jeong, Jiwoo Jeong, Hyeonjin Kim, Yunseok Lee, Woojin Lee
arXiv:2605. 00123v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Safety trained large language models (LLMs) can often be induced to answer harmful requests through jailbreak prompts.
By Shubham Kumar, Narendra Ahuja
arXiv:2601. 13359v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Prefill attacks are an effective and low-cost jailbreaking method, as they directly insert an acceptance sequence (e.
By Asen Dotsinski, Panagiotis Eustratiadis
arXiv:2508. 10029v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Safety-aligned large language models can still be manipulated through white-box interventions that modify their internal representations.
By Wenpeng Xing, Bohan Yang, Mohan Li, Chunqiang Hu, Haitao Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Bo Lin, Meng Han
arXiv:2606. 11817v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for code generation, raising concerns that they may be misused to produce malicious code.
By Yitong Zhang, Shiteng Lu, Jia Li
arXiv:2606. 25182v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Jailbreak attacks reveal a persistent weakness in aligned Large Language Models: carefully crafted prompts can elicit policy-violating responses despite safety training.
By Sofiia Nikolenko, Michele Papucci, Mina Rezaei, Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal
arXiv:2602. 12418v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Jailbreak attacks remain a persistent threat to large language model safety.
By Yannick Assogba, Jacopo Cortellazzi, Javier Abad, Pau Rodriguez, Xavier Suau, Arno Blaas
arXiv:2512. 14751v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Finetuning pretrained large language models (LLMs) has become the standard paradigm for developing downstream applications.
By Yixin Tan, Zhe Yu, Rui Wen, Jun Sakuma
arXiv:2503. 24191v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Content Warning: This paper may contain unsafe or harmful content generated by LLMs that may be offensive to readers.
By Shuoming Zhang, Jiacheng Zhao, Hanyuan Dong, Ruiyuan Xu, Zhicheng Li, Yangyu Zhang, Shuaijiang Li, Yuan Wen, Chunwei Xia, Zheng Wang, Xiaobing Feng, Huimin Cui
arXiv:2502. 09755v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Safety-aligned LLMs respond to prompts with either compliance or refusal, each corresponding to distinct directions in the model's activation space.
By Amit Levi, Rom Himelstein, Yaniv Nemcovsky, Avi Mendelson, Chaim Baskin
arXiv:2607. 12792v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Jailbreak-robustness research typically evaluates safety through generated responses using an LLM-as-judge approach.
By Roman Prosvirnin, Victor Minchenkov, Alexey Soldatov, Vladimir Bashun
arXiv:2606. 25750v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety evaluation of large language models (LLMs) is commonly performed by querying models with unsafe or jailbreak prompts and judging whether their outputs violate a safety policy.
By Chang-Chieh Huang, Yan-Lun Chen, Chia-Mu Yu, Wei-Bin Lee