arXiv Machine Learning

Pushing the (Decision) Boundaries: Dynamically Calibrating Differentially Private Noise to Explainability in Federated Learning

The paper introduces XCal-FL, a federated learning algorithm that dynamically calibrates differential privacy noise using three signals—prediction logit variations, counterfactual margins, and saliency concentration—to improve both predictive accuracy and explanation fidelity. Experiments on medical imaging datasets demonstrate that XCal-FL outperforms static-noise and state‑of‑the‑art adaptive DP methods, achieving over 10% better accuracy and up to fivefold higher explanation fidelity while using privacy budgets more efficiently. The study highlights that explanation fidelity behaves non‑linearly with privacy loss, indicating that explainability is a separate dimension of the privacy trade‑off.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 3

Pushing the (Decision) Boundaries: Dynamically Calibrating Differentially Private Noise to Explainability in Federated Learning

The paper introduces XCal-FL, a federated learning algorithm that dynamically calibrates differential privacy noise using three signals—prediction logit variations, counterfactual margins, and saliency concentration—to improve both predictive accuracy and explanation fidelity. Experiments on medical imaging datasets demonstrate that XCal-FL outperforms static-noise and state‑of‑the‑art adaptive DP methods, achieving over 10% better accuracy and up to five‑fold higher explanation fidelity while using privacy budgets more efficiently. The study reveals that explanation fidelity behaves non‑linearly with privacy loss, indicating that explainability is a separate dimension of the privacy trade‑off that cannot be inferred from utility alone.

arXiv Computer Vision
6d ago

Evaluating Federated Vision-Language and Vision-Only Models for Privacy-Aware Breast Cancer Imaging

The paper evaluates privacy‑aware federated learning for breast cancer imaging by comparing pretrained vision‑language models (CLIP, BiomedCLIP) and a ViT‑B/16 baseline on two public datasets, with and without differential privacy. All five models achieve high normal‑versus‑sick discrimination (ROC‑AUC 0.940‑0.990), but acquisition year alone attains 0.974, indicating potential confounding. Removing the text pathway keeps accuracy while cutting communication cost, while differential privacy lowers ROC‑AUC by 0.375 due to perturbing the full model state.

By Malithi Mithsara Wanniarachchi Kankanamge, Ning Yang, Sree Bash Debnath, Md Zobaer Islam, Abdur R. Shahid
Hugging Face Trending Papers
5d ago

Fed-IGTD: A federated learning-based framework for tabular-to-image encoding

Fed-IGTD is a federated learning framework that enables tabular-to-image encoding without centralizing data. It reconstructs a global correlation matrix from local statistics and trains a CNN via Federated Averaging, while applying two differential privacy mechanisms: a one-shot Gaussian noise addition during correlation aggregation and a client‑level DP‑FedAvg during training. Experiments on five datasets show that privacy protection during mapping construction has minimal impact on performance, whereas DP‑FedAvg can significantly degrade utility, especially with small client cohorts and moderate privacy budgets.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 27

The pretraining domain outweighs the training objective in setting the privacy-utility trade-off of differentially private medical image analysis

arXiv:2601. 19618v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Differential privacy protects the patients whose images train medical imaging models, but it lowers diagnostic accuracy, and the initialization is the strongest known remedy.

By Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Mina Farajiamiri, Mahshad Lotfinia, Behrus Hinrichs-Puladi, Jonas Bienzeisler, Mohamed Alhaskir, Mirabela Rusu, Christiane Kuhl, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn
arXiv AI
Aug 18

Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Federated Learning via Explainable Adaptive Differential Privacy

arXiv:2509. 10691v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Decentralized federated learning enables collaborative model training without a central server, but shared model updates can still leak sensitive information through inversion, reconstruction, and membership inference attacks.

By Fardin Jalil Piran, Zhiling Chen, Yang Zhang, Qianyu Zhou, Jiong Tang, Farhad Imani
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Aegis: Generative Gradient Masking for Privacy-Preserving Medical Federated Learning

Aegis is a client‑side defense for medical federated learning that protects against model inversion attacks by adding a masking gradient derived from locally synthesized data. The method exploits the fact that attacks fail when the effective batch size exceeds the model’s leakage capacity, turning this bottleneck into a privacy guarantee. Experiments on MNIST, CIFAR‑10, and MedMNIST datasets show that Aegis neutralizes state‑of‑the‑art attacks while preserving model accuracy and adding only modest overhead.

By Chaoyu Zhang, Shanghao Shi, Heng Jin, Ning Wang, Y. Thomas Hou, Wenjing Lou
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Picture the Epsilon: Pursuing Identity-Level Privacy Guarantees for Images

The paper compares four audit methods for assessing identity‑level differential privacy in pre‑trained, black‑box face generators. Each method—GaussMech, KDE‑LR, MMD‑TV, and ROC‑HT—has distinct assumptions, hyperparameters, and finite‑sample limitations, and they produce markedly different epsilon estimates when applied to FaceFusion and InstantID. The study finds that all methods reveal significant identity distinguishability, but none can be reliably ranked in this high‑distinguishability regime, suggesting that future work should evaluate them on partially private mechanisms.

By Arman Zareian Jahromi, Vishnu Bondalakunta, Mohammad Akbar Bin Shah, Naimul Haque, Shuangqing Wei, George T. Amariucai