arXiv:2604. 27011v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AutoML, intended as the process of automating the application of machine learning to real-world problems, is a key step for AI popularisation.
By Alessia Berarducci, Eric Rossetto, Alessandro Antonucci, Marco Zaffalon
arXiv:2511. 00079v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: flowengineR is an R package designed to provide a modular and extensible framework for building reproducible algorithmic workflows for general-purpose machine learning pipelines.
By Maximilian Willer, Peter Ruckdeschel
FairCompressAgent (FCA) is an agentic framework that unifies fairness-aware pruning, incremental quantization, and sparse low‑rank factorization for FPGA deployment. A language‑model planner selects compression configurations based on model profiles and measured outcomes, while an execution layer handles compression, fine‑tuning, evaluation, and constraint‑based selection. Experiments on Fitzpatrick‑17k with VGG‑11 show FCA can reduce inference tensor storage by 59.54% under accuracy constraints, improve validation average precision, and lower equalized opportunity, achieving similar results to one‑shot planning with fewer candidate evaluations.
By Yuanbo Guo, Yiyu Shi
arXiv:2609.16321v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Existing fairness analysis tools predominantly operate as post-training evaluation frameworks, requiring practitioners to complete the full model dev...
By Archit Rathod, Saeid Tizpaz-Niari
arXiv:2608. 08700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable evaluation of tool routing is critical as Large Language Models increasingly operate as autonomous agents.
By Dongjie Xu, Julius, Hanchi Dong, Minghua Tang, Yuxuan Sun, Ziwei Nie, Zicheng Liu, Dujun Qing, Jiajie Xu
The paper argues that fairness failures in generative models arise mainly from inadequate evaluation practices, making fairness findings hard to compare or use for deployment. It diagnoses common empirical and conceptual shortcomings in current methods and calls for a move toward standardized, generative‑specific evaluation. The authors introduce Fairness Cards, a minimal reporting artifact that explicitly documents evaluation choices—such as prompt families, counterfactual protocols, metrics, and refusal handling—to improve reproducibility, comparability, and accountability.
By Mariia Vladimirova, Jean-Yves Franceschi, Thibaut Issenhuth
arXiv:2607. 09424v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present Soofi S 30B-A3B, a sovereign, open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) hybrid Mamba Transformer foundation model for German and English.
By The Soofi-Team, :, Benedikt Droste, David Fitzek, Ruben H\"arle, Lukas Helff, Maximilian Idahl, Alex Jude, Abbas Goher Khan, Maurice Kraus, Timm Ruland, Richard Rutmann, Sebastian Sztwiertnia, Markus Frey, Daniil Gurgurov, Jan Pfister, Tom R\"ohr, Sebastian von Rohrscheidt, J\"org Bienert, Nicolas Flores-Herr, Simon Gottschalk, Andreas Hotho, Kristian Kersting, Joachim K\"ohler, Alexander L\"oser, Wolfgang Nejdl, Simon Ostermann, Jan Plogsties, Patrick Putzky, Mehdi Ali, Michael Fromm, Max L\"ubbering
arXiv:2601.03087v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit systematic biases across demographic groups. Auditing is proposed as an accountability tool for black-box LLM...
By David Hartmann, Lena Pohlmann, Lelia Hanslik, Noah Gie{\ss}ing, Bettina Berendt, Pieter Delobelle
arXiv:2509. 16462v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in high-stakes decision-making systems, where biased predictions can reinforce social and economic disparities.
By Mina Arzaghi, Alireza Dehghanpour Farashah, Florian Carichon, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Plante, Golnoosh Farnadi
Despite groundbreaking advancements in generative models during the last decade, concerns about their lack of fairness, reinforcing societal inequalities and harming marginalized groups, remain under-...
arXiv:2607. 21300v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine unlearning has emerged as a tool for removing personal data from trained models to comply with recent AI regulations.
By Lorenzo Orsingher, Thomas De Min, Massimiliano Mancini, Davide Talon, Elisa Ricci
The paper introduces the AR Fairness Metamodel, a structured framework for representing, analyzing, and comparing fairness scenarios. It incorporates key elements such as agents, resources, and their attributes, and supports both discrete and continuous fairness measures—including equality, equity, group fairness, individual fairness, the Gini index, the Theil index, Jain's fairness index, and a specific measure for Australia's Child Care Subsidy. The metamodel builds on the Tiles framework, offering modular components that can be connected to capture diverse fairness definitions, and includes formal proofs of relationships among group fairness, individual fairness, and envy‑freeness. An open‑source implementation of the Tiles framework is provided to facilitate practical fairness modeling and evaluation across various applications.
By Julian Alfredo Mendez, Timotheus Kampik