DocAttriBench (DAB) is a large‑scale benchmark for fine‑grained, element‑level source attribution in Document Visual Question Answering (VQA). It introduces MAPPET, a Mask‑based Perplexity‑Derived Attribution method that uses document layout and language modeling to identify the most informative layout element for each answer. The benchmark contains 237k documents and 296k question‑answer pairs with element‑level grounding, and it evaluates multimodal LLMs on answer accuracy, attribution accuracy, and overall answer quality, revealing that even strong models often fail to localize supporting elements.
By Luca De Grandis (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), Silvia Cappelletti (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), William Raccagni (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy), Marcella Cornia (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), Lorenzo Baraldi (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), Rita Cucchiara (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy)
VELD-QA is a large-scale benchmark for visual evidence grounding and question answering in long documents, comprising 15,000 human-authored question-answer pairs across 5,859 PDFs with 372,445 pages. The dataset includes detailed annotations of supporting pages, visual evidence elements, and descriptions of cited visual content, enabling separate evaluation of retrieval, localization, and interpretation. Experiments on nine vision-language models and various retrieval-augmented systems reveal significant gaps in evidence localization and visual interpretation, with oracle accuracy peaking at 81.7% and enrichment of visual-element annotations narrowing performance gaps by 17–24%.
By Zhivar Sourati, Marianne Menglin Liu, Rongguang Wang, Zheng Wang, Yazhe Hu, Lan Guo, Yuying Wang, Mengqing Guo, Bhavesh Dnyaneshwar Gore, Shubham Pathak, Ramapriya Ranganath, Sandeep Sharma, Tao Sheng, Sujith Ravi, Dan Roth
Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance in text-vision tasks, their robustness and transferability to different document domains remains underexplored.
arXiv:2607. 07179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents.
By Miguel Lopez-Duran, Elena Marrero, Julian Fierrez, Marta Robledo-Moreno, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Daniel DeAlcala, Aythami Morales, Ruben Tolosana, Oscar Delgado, Alvaro Ortigosa, Javier Ortega-Garcia
arXiv:2607. 09068v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advancements in LVLMs necessitate robust benchmarks for complex, visually grounded reasoning.
By Yang Chen, Yunwen Li, Yufan Shen, Minghao Liu, Tianyu Zheng, Bin Fu, Qunshu Lin, Zhi Yu, Botian Shi
The paper introduces an empirical attribution framework to pinpoint failures in multi‑page visually rich document understanding systems. By applying controlled interventions in a unified document question‑answering pipeline, the authors analyze how evidence representation, selection, and usage affect performance. Experiments on MMLongBench‑Doc reveal that complementary modalities can mitigate conversion errors, that adding non‑gold pages can both correct and break answers, and that abstention strategies trade unsupported answers for false refusals, with varying effects across different backbones.
By Lewei Xu, Yihao Ding, Zihan Xu, Daniel Yitian Su, Daochang Liu, Siwen Luo, Yifan Peng, Wei Liu
arXiv:2606. 16092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world documents combine text with tables, charts, photographs, and diagrams arranged in diverse layouts, yet existing research on multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for document QA predominantly produces text-only responses, underutilizing these visual elements.
By Young Rok Jang, Hyesoo Kong, Kyunghwan An, Jae Sub Huh, Gyeonghun Kim, Stanley Jungkyu Choi
Document understanding systems are typically evaluated as separate components via layout analysis, optical text recognition, reading-order prediction, and image captioning. This separation leaves scie...
arXiv:2610.20335v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Document understanding systems are typically evaluated as separate components via layout analysis, optical text recognition, reading-order prediction,...
By Yuheng Chen, Yufan Chen, Zhuojun Cai, Ruiping Liu, Junwei Zheng, Jiale Wei, Di Wen, Weijia Fan, Kunyu Peng, Jiaming Zhang, Rainer Stiefelhagen
arXiv:2604. 13731v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-page Document Visual Question Answering requires reasoning over semantics, layouts, and visual elements in long, visually dense documents.
By Yuanlei Zheng, Pei Fu, Hang Li, Ziyang Wang, Yuyi Zhang, Wenyu Ruan, Xiaojin Zhang, Zhongyu Wei, Zhenbo Luo, Jian Luan, Wei Chen, Xiang Bai
The paper introduces Invoice Haystack, a benchmark of 1,500 anonymized invoices and 200 question‑answer pairs that tests document retrieval and visual question answering under strong visual homogeneity. It shows that existing benchmarks suffer from embedding collapse, with Invoice Haystack’s mean pairwise cosine similarity at 0.73 versus 0.38 and 0.31 in DocHaystack and InfoHaystack. The authors propose VL‑RAG, a hybrid retrieval‑augmented generation framework that combines text and visual embeddings and a VLM‑based verification filter, achieving 60.0% Recall@1 on Invoice Haystack‑500 and improving performance on other benchmarks.
By Heethanjan Kanagalingam, Thenukan Pathmanathan, Mokeeshan Vathanakumar, Basim Azam, Sarah Monazam Erfani, Naveed Akhtar
The paper introduces the Generative Embedding Benchmark (GEB), which evaluates how much content from an embedding can be recovered by a decoder that only has access to the frozen embedding and a question, without the original image or intermediate features. GEB uses a curated visual‑question‑answering dataset with 1,800 development and 900 test items covering natural images, scene text, and visual documents. Experiments on seven public embedding models show that visual‑only scores range from 28.25 to 33.21, while joint image‑question encoding boosts scores up to 65.56, revealing that generative readout uncovers information bottlenecks not captured by traditional separability‑based benchmarks.
By Yun Li, Biao Yang, Peixi Wu, Yunhao Zhou, Mingzhou Jiang, Wei Yuan, Fan Yang, Wenwu Ou