arXiv Computer Vision By Luca De Grandis (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), Silvia Cappelletti (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), William Raccagni (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy), Marcella Cornia (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), Lorenzo Baraldi (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy), Rita Cucchiara (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy)

DocAttriBench: Benchmarking Answer Grounding in Document Visual Question Answering

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

DocAttriBench (DAB) is a large‑scale benchmark for fine‑grained, element‑level source attribution in Document Visual Question Answering (VQA). It introduces MAPPET, a Mask‑based Perplexity‑Derived Attribution method that uses document layout and language modeling to identify the most informative layout element for each answer. The benchmark contains 237k documents and 296k question‑answer pairs with element‑level grounding, and it evaluates multimodal LLMs on answer accuracy, attribution accuracy, and overall answer quality, revealing that even strong models often fail to localize supporting elements.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 17

DocAttriBench: Benchmarking Answer Grounding in Document Visual Question Answering

DocAttriBench (DAB) is a large-scale benchmark that provides fine-grained, element-level source attribution for Document Visual Question Answering (VQA). It introduces MAPPET, a Mask-based Perplexity-Derived Attribution method that uses document layout and language modeling to identify the most informative layout element for each answer. The benchmark contains 237k documents and 296k question-answer pairs with grounding annotations, and it evaluates multimodal LLMs on answer accuracy, attribution accuracy, and overall answer quality.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16

VELD-QA: A Large-Scale Dataset for Visual Evidence Grounding and Question Answering in Long Documents

VELD-QA is a large-scale benchmark for visual evidence grounding and question answering in long documents, comprising 15,000 human-authored question-answer pairs across 5,859 PDFs with 372,445 pages. The dataset includes detailed annotations of supporting pages, visual evidence elements, and descriptions of cited visual content, enabling separate evaluation of retrieval, localization, and interpretation. Experiments on nine vision-language models and various retrieval-augmented systems reveal significant gaps in evidence localization and visual interpretation, with oracle accuracy peaking at 81.7% and enrichment of visual-element annotations narrowing performance gaps by 17–24%.

By Zhivar Sourati, Marianne Menglin Liu, Rongguang Wang, Zheng Wang, Yazhe Hu, Lan Guo, Yuying Wang, Mengqing Guo, Bhavesh Dnyaneshwar Gore, Shubham Pathak, Ramapriya Ranganath, Sandeep Sharma, Tao Sheng, Sujith Ravi, Dan Roth
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9

Comparative Study of Domain-adapted VLMs for General Document Visual Question Answering

arXiv:2607. 07179v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents.

By Miguel Lopez-Duran, Elena Marrero, Julian Fierrez, Marta Robledo-Moreno, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Daniel DeAlcala, Aythami Morales, Ruben Tolosana, Oscar Delgado, Alvaro Ortigosa, Javier Ortega-Garcia
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 8

Comparative Study of Domain-adapted VLMs for General Document Visual Question Answering

Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance in text-vision tasks, their robustness and transferability to different document domains remains underexplored.

arXiv AI
Oct 19

Locating Failure in Multi-Page Visually Rich Document Understanding Systems: An Empirical Attribution

The paper introduces an empirical attribution framework to pinpoint failures in multi‑page visually rich document understanding systems. By applying controlled interventions in a unified document question‑answering pipeline, the authors analyze how evidence representation, selection, and usage affect performance. Experiments on MMLongBench‑Doc reveal that complementary modalities can mitigate conversion errors, that adding non‑gold pages can both correct and break answers, and that abstention strategies trade unsupported answers for false refusals, with varying effects across different backbones.

By Lewei Xu, Yihao Ding, Zihan Xu, Daniel Yitian Su, Daochang Liu, Siwen Luo, Yifan Peng, Wei Liu