arXiv:2603. 10937v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The use of synthetic data has become increasingly popular as a privacy-preserving alternative to sharing real datasets, especially in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, and demography.
By Rajdeep Pathak, Amit Basak, Sayantee Jana
arXiv:2512. 03238v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: High quality data is needed to unlock the full potential of AI for end users.
By Natalia Ponomareva, Zheng Xu, H. Brendan McMahan, Peter Kairouz, Lucas Rosenblatt, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Crist\'obal Guzm\'an, Ryan McKenna, Galen Andrew, Alex Bie, Da Yu, Alex Kurakin, Morteza Zadimoghaddam, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Andreas Terzis
arXiv:2507. 19700v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a new framework for generating tabular synthetic datasets via disjoint generative models.
By Anton Danholt Lautrup, Muhammad Rajabinasab, Tobias Hyrup, Arthur Zimek, Peter Schneider-Kamp
arXiv:2606. 08259v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper investigates the problem of generating synthetic tabular data with differential privacy (DP) guarantees, enabling data sharing in sensitive domains.
By Toan Tran, Arturs Backurs, Zinan Lin, Victor Reis, Li Xiong, Sergey Yekhanin
arXiv:2608.29674v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Sharing tabular data in high-stakes domains is constrained by privacy regulations. Synthetic data offer a promising alternative, but deep generative mo...
By Jinmeng Li, Quan Zhang, Hangting Ye, He Zhao, Firas Laakom, Dandan Guo, J\"urgen Schmidhuber
arXiv:2606. 09865v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Privacy and data sharing are often in tension.
By Manel Slokom, Malek Slokom, Thierno Kante
arXiv:2609.38934v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Differentially private (DP) text generation can protect individual records, but privacy alone does not specify what evidence a released statement car...
By Tsubasa Takahashi, Takumi Hiraoka
arXiv:2608. 05737v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Local Differential Privacy (LDP) provides strong privacy guarantees for collecting numerical data.
By Incheol Baek, Hyungbin Kim, Yon Dohn Chung
arXiv:2606. 08372v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthetic data is increasingly promoted as a privacy-preserving substitute for releasing sensitive tabular records, yet its central adversarial threat ("reconstruction", the recovery of an individual's hidden attribute values from a synthetic release and a handful of known quasi-identifiers) has been studied only in scattered, hard-to-compare settings.
By Steven Golob, Sikha Pentyala, Martine De Cock
The paper argues that evaluating anonymity in synthetic data generation must focus on the generative model rather than just the resulting dataset. It interprets GDPR definitions of personal data and anonymization under realistic model-access scenarios, mapping these to state‑of‑the‑art privacy attacks. The authors conclude that synthetic data alone is insufficient for anonymization, and that Differential Privacy offers stronger protection than Similarity‑based Privacy Metrics.
By Georgi Ganev, Emiliano De Cristofaro
arXiv:2607. 07471v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness.
By Vin\'icius Gabriel Angelozzi, H\'eber H. Arcolezi