arXiv:2608.29674v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Sharing tabular data in high-stakes domains is constrained by privacy regulations. Synthetic data offer a promising alternative, but deep generative mo...
By Jinmeng Li, Quan Zhang, Hangting Ye, He Zhao, Firas Laakom, Dandan Guo, J\"urgen Schmidhuber
arXiv:2606. 08259v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper investigates the problem of generating synthetic tabular data with differential privacy (DP) guarantees, enabling data sharing in sensitive domains.
By Toan Tran, Arturs Backurs, Zinan Lin, Victor Reis, Li Xiong, Sergey Yekhanin
arXiv:2606. 09865v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Privacy and data sharing are often in tension.
By Manel Slokom, Malek Slokom, Thierno Kante
The paper argues that evaluating anonymity in synthetic data generation must focus on the generative model rather than just the resulting dataset. It interprets GDPR definitions of personal data and anonymization under realistic model-access scenarios, mapping these to state‑of‑the‑art privacy attacks. The authors conclude that synthetic data alone is insufficient for anonymization, and that Differential Privacy offers stronger protection than Similarity‑based Privacy Metrics.
By Georgi Ganev, Emiliano De Cristofaro
arXiv:2602. 05833v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: There is a need for synthetic training and test datasets that replicate statistical distributions of original datasets without compromising their confidentiality.
By Laura Plein, Alexi Turcotte, Arina Hallemans, Andreas Zeller
We revisit the fairness notion of disparate impact for synthetic data generation (SDG), that assesses whether the utility of generated records is the same across sensitive groups. Our approach departs from existing work on fair SDG, that address the problem of correcting for undue biases in the observed distribution, hence redefining SDG as learning a distribution that is not that of the real data.
arXiv:2512. 03238v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: High quality data is needed to unlock the full potential of AI for end users.
By Natalia Ponomareva, Zheng Xu, H. Brendan McMahan, Peter Kairouz, Lucas Rosenblatt, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Crist\'obal Guzm\'an, Ryan McKenna, Galen Andrew, Alex Bie, Da Yu, Alex Kurakin, Morteza Zadimoghaddam, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Andreas Terzis
arXiv:2607. 07471v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness.
By Vin\'icius Gabriel Angelozzi, H\'eber H. Arcolezi
arXiv:2604. 07486v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for synthetic data generation.
By Qian Ma, Sarah Rajtmajer
Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for privacy-preserving data analysis, while fairness-aware mechanisms aim to mitigate discrimination against underrepresented groups.
arXiv:2608. 10891v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time series forecasting in privacy-sensitive domains often requires training models on released data rather than original observations.
By Luis Amorim, Vitor Cerqueira, Moises Santos, Paulo J. Azevedo, Carlos Soares
arXiv:2606. 16952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.
By Kareem Amin, Rudrajit Das, Alessandro Epasto, Adel Javanmard, Dennis Kraft, M\'onica Ribero, Sergei Vassilvitskii