The paper argues that evaluating anonymity in synthetic data generation must focus on the generative model rather than just the resulting dataset. It interprets GDPR definitions of personal data and anonymization under realistic model-access scenarios, mapping these to state‑of‑the‑art privacy attacks. The authors conclude that synthetic data alone is insufficient for anonymization, and that Differential Privacy offers stronger protection than Similarity‑based Privacy Metrics.
By Georgi Ganev, Emiliano De Cristofaro
arXiv:2606. 16952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.
By Kareem Amin, Rudrajit Das, Alessandro Epasto, Adel Javanmard, Dennis Kraft, M\'onica Ribero, Sergei Vassilvitskii
arXiv:2609.38934v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Differentially private (DP) text generation can protect individual records, but privacy alone does not specify what evidence a released statement car...
By Tsubasa Takahashi, Takumi Hiraoka
arXiv:2606. 16952v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.
By Kareem Amin, Rudrajit Das, Alessandro Epasto, Adel Javanmard, Dennis Kraft, M\'onica Ribero, Sergei Vassilvitskii
arXiv:2607. 07471v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness.
By Vin\'icius Gabriel Angelozzi, H\'eber H. Arcolezi
arXiv:2602. 05833v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: There is a need for synthetic training and test datasets that replicate statistical distributions of original datasets without compromising their confidentiality.
By Laura Plein, Alexi Turcotte, Arina Hallemans, Andreas Zeller
Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, raising concerns about both privacy and fairness. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for privacy-preserving data analysis, while fairness-aware mechanisms aim to mitigate discrimination against underrepresented groups.
arXiv:2604. 07486v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for synthetic data generation.
By Qian Ma, Sarah Rajtmajer
arXiv:2606. 08259v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper investigates the problem of generating synthetic tabular data with differential privacy (DP) guarantees, enabling data sharing in sensitive domains.
By Toan Tran, Arturs Backurs, Zinan Lin, Victor Reis, Li Xiong, Sergey Yekhanin
arXiv:2507. 19700v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a new framework for generating tabular synthetic datasets via disjoint generative models.
By Anton Danholt Lautrup, Muhammad Rajabinasab, Tobias Hyrup, Arthur Zimek, Peter Schneider-Kamp
arXiv:2606. 24408v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Assessing the privacy of large language models (LLMs) presents significant challenges.
By Lorenzo Rossi, Bart{\l}omiej Marek, Franziska Boenisch, Adam Dziedzic
arXiv:2609.37344v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Data reconstruction attacks have empirically been successful in recovering training samples from learned models, raising privacy concerns and motivat...
By Max Cairney-Leeming, Simone Bombari, Marco Mondelli