arXiv AI

Harnessing the Wisdom of LLM Crowds through Complementarity-Driven Iterative Collaboration

arXiv:2607. 29087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings, yet individual models remain bounded by model-specific capability limitations.

arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

You're Hired: Strategic Model Selection for LLM Collaboration

arXiv:2609.38816v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While multi-agent and model collaboration algorithms gain traction to combine the strengths of diverse Large Language Models (LLMs), existing systems r...

By Zongwan Cao, Ziyuan Yang, Shangbin Feng, Michael Duan, Skyler Hallinan, Bingbing Wen, Lucy Lu Wang, Yulia Tsvetkov
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Loom: Weaving Diagnostic Strands into Free-Text Consensus via Embedding-Space Reweighting

Loom is a generative consensus framework designed for real‑world root‑cause analysis (RCA) that combines open‑form hypotheses from modular heuristics with a lightweight large language model (LLM) synthesis step. It projects hypotheses into a continuous embedding space and uses an iterative centroid‑based reweighting algorithm to resolve conflicts, producing a single consensus that is then synthesized by one LLM call. On the OpenRCA benchmark Loom matches state‑of‑the‑art autonomous agents on some datasets while achieving significantly higher efficiency—about 26× faster and 33× faster with an 8B‑parameter synthesizer. whyItMatters":"Loom demonstrates how embedding‑space reweighting can bridge the gap between statistical rigor and expressive LLMs, enabling efficient, trustworthy RCA in industrial settings."

By Ron Begleiter, Katya Egert Berg, Gilad Saban, Gil Shabat
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

Loom: Weaving Diagnostic Strands into Free-Text Consensus via Embedding-Space Reweighting

Loom is a generative consensus framework designed for real‑world root‑cause analysis (RCA) that combines open‑form hypotheses from modular heuristics with a lightweight large language model (LLM). It projects hypotheses into a continuous embedding space and uses an iterative centroid‑based reweighting algorithm to resolve conflicts, producing a single consensus that is then synthesized by one LLM call. On the OpenRCA benchmark, Loom achieves state‑of‑the‑art accuracy on Bank and Market‑2 while being significantly faster and more efficient than existing autonomous agents.

arXiv AI
Sep 24

COMED: The Missing Middle Between Routing and Collaboration in Multi-LLM Inference

COMED (Controlled Model Escalation for Multi-LLM Deliberation) is a post-anchor controller that selectively engages cross-model collaboration in multi-LLM inference. It uses anchor self‑consistency, router margin, and a lightweight peer probe to accept confident answers, verify ambiguous cases, and only escalates when collaboration is likely beneficial. Experiments on medical, scientific, and general reasoning benchmarks show that COMED improves performance across 16 open‑weight settings, achieving up to +10.7 percentage points on MedQA and outperforming dense collaboration while invoking fewer models and decoded tokens.

By Norah Alballa, Wenxuan Zhang, Salma Kharrat, Fares Fourati, Zafar Ayyub Qazi, Mohamed Elhoseiny, Marco Canini
arXiv AI
Jun 9

SearchSwarm: Towards Delegation Intelligence in Agentic LLMs for Long-Horizon Deep Research

arXiv:2606. 09730v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly expected to handle complex, long-horizon real-world tasks whose context demands can grow without bound, yet model context windows remain inherently finite.

By Pu Ning, Quan Chen, Kun Tao, Xinyu Tang, Tianshu Wang, Qianggang Cao, Xinyu Kong, Zujie Wen, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou
arXiv AI
Jul 1

ClawArena-Team: Benchmarking Subagent Orchestration and Dynamic Workflows in Language-Model Agents

arXiv:2606. 31174v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Production large language-model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed not as lone problem-solvers but as managers: a main model creates specialized subagents, delegates work, and orchestrates their parallel, asynchronous returns through dynamic workflows.

By Kaiwen Xiong, Haonian Ji, Shi Qiu, Zeyu Zheng, Cihang Xie, Xinyu Ye, Huaxiu Yao