arXiv AI By Artem Maryanskyy, Dmitry Budnikov, Alibek T. Kaliyev

When Agents Disagree: The Selection Bottleneck in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2603. 20324v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent LLM pipelines produce contradictory evidence on whether team diversity improves output quality: heterogeneous Mixture-of-Agents teams outperform single models, yet homogeneous Self-MoA teams consistently win under synthesis-based aggregation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
4d ago

An Exact Generate - Transform Decomposition of Small-LLM Team Scaling Across Orchestration Architectures

The paper investigates how scaling a team of small language‑model agents affects performance across different orchestration architectures. By testing eight architectures on five short‑answer benchmarks and an executable‑code benchmark, it finds that team scaling yields large gains on arithmetic word‑problem tasks but only modest improvements on multiple‑choice and code generation tasks, with no single architecture dominating all tasks. The authors explain these patterns using a generate‑transform decomposition that separates coverage and transformation effects, showing that arithmetic tasks benefit from both coverage and critic‑guided transformation, while other tasks are limited by saturation or poor conversion.

By Blaz Bertalanic, Carolina Fortuna
arXiv AI
6d ago

Multi-agent Scaling Across Disjunctive and Compensatory Tasks

The paper introduces Steiner’s taxonomy of group tasks to study how multi‑agent large language model (LLM) teams scale on disjunctive versus compensatory tasks. By modeling agents as conditionally independent given the item, it shows that plurality voting converges to the modal answer while averaging converges to the item‑level bias. Experiments with 13 open‑weight models and up to 30 agents reveal that disjunctive tasks benefit from larger teams, whereas compensatory tasks like Fermi estimation see little improvement, highlighting that task structure and aggregation method fundamentally determine team scaling.

By Carolina Fortuna, Blaz Bertalanic
arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

You're Hired: Strategic Model Selection for LLM Collaboration

arXiv:2609.38816v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While multi-agent and model collaboration algorithms gain traction to combine the strengths of diverse Large Language Models (LLMs), existing systems r...

By Zongwan Cao, Ziyuan Yang, Shangbin Feng, Michael Duan, Skyler Hallinan, Bingbing Wen, Lucy Lu Wang, Yulia Tsvetkov