arXiv:2606. 04906v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although it is generally agreed that AI-generated text poses a broad societal risk, there is no common understanding in the AI-generated text detection literature on what constitutes harmful use.
By Nils Dycke, Marina Sakharova, Nico Daheim, Iryna Gurevych
arXiv:2606. 04205v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The growing popularity and capacity of generative models have eroded the distinction between human and machine-generated content, motivating a growing body of work on detection across text, images, and audio.
By Sajad Ebrahimi, Nima Jamali, Bardia Shirsalimian, Kelly McConvey, Wentao Zhang, Jalehsadat Mahdavimoghaddam, Maksym Taranukhin, Maura Grossman, Vered Shwartz, Yuntian Deng, Ebrahim Bagheri
We’re launching a classifier trained to distinguish between AI-written and human-written text.
arXiv:2607. 03680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent AI-generated text detection work often introduces a new benchmark together with a specialized detector tailored to it.
By Zhuoer Shen, Mingyi Wang, Shaofeng Zou, Yuheng Bu
arXiv:2503. 15639v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern scene text recognition systems often depend on large end-to-end architectures that require extensive training and are prohibitively expensive for real-time scenarios.
By Ritabrata Chakraborty, Shivakumara Palaiahnakote, Umapada Pal, Cheng-Lin Liu
arXiv:2411. 19537v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We survey deepfake generation and detection techniques, covering all deepfake media types: image, video, audio and multimodal content.
By Florinel-Alin Croitoru, Andrei-Iulian Hiji, Vlad Hondru, Nicolae Catalin Ristea, Paul Irofti, Marius Popescu, Cristian Rusu, Radu Tudor Ionescu, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Mubarak Shah
arXiv:2606. 00016v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting AI-generated text is becoming increasingly challenging as modern language models approach human-level fluency and can evade detectors that rely on surface statistics or likelihood-based signals.
By Aria Nourbakhsh, Adelaide Danilov, Christoph Schommer, Salima Lamsiyah
The paper evaluates open-source OCR, LLM, and VLM systems on a high‑risk public sector task: extracting structured data from student application documents. Results show that VLMs generally outperform OCR+LLM pipelines, yet only 4 of 35 configurations achieve F1 scores above 0.5, with most combinations scoring below 0.25. Model size and input quality, especially preserving OCR structure, are critical factors influencing performance.
By Elias Schubert, Felix Bie{\ss}mann
arXiv:2606. 00402v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose a distribution-free statistical framework that converts arbitrary rewrite-based detectors into detectors with finite-sample FDR guarantees without retraining.
By Yi Liu
arXiv:2606. 14748v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present the Membership Inference Test (MINT) Demo 2, a framework designed to improve transparency in machine learning training processes.
By Daniel DeAlcala, Gonzalo Mancera, Julian Fierrez, Aythami Morales, Ruben Tolosana, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez
arXiv:2606. 03686v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present DeepSpeak-Agentic, a dataset of videos comprising over 37 hours of semi-structured conversations between a human and an embodied AI agent.
By Sarah Barrington, Maty Bohacek, Hany Farid
arXiv:2606. 07313v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting machine-generated text is especially difficult under distribution shift, such as transfer across domains, source models, and editing attacks.
By Mikhail Vishnyakov, Tatiana Gaintseva