SAFARI is the first industrial benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in automotive hazard analysis and risk assessment (HARA) under ISO 26262. It comprises 3,000 de‑identified HARA cases and tests two tasks: open‑ended hazard generation and standards‑grounded risk classification, using a novel reference‑anchored LLM‑as‑a‑judge protocol. Experiments with nine state‑of‑the‑art LLMs show that while hazard narratives are often plausible, risk classification remains weak (best ASIL macro‑F1 = 0.261), with errors mainly due to missing scenario context and misjudged controllability. "whyItMatters":"The benchmark highlights the current limitations of LLMs in safety‑critical engineering workflows, guiding future research and expert oversight in automotive safety analysis."
arXiv:2607. 18665v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly support science, but they can also convert hazardous scientific knowledge into actionable misuse guidance.
The paper introduces BoardSafety, a benchmark that transforms manufacturer datasheets and hardware guides into a board‑specific safety rule base for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on hardware safety judgments. Each data item pairs a development board and a proposed operation with a safety rule and a ground‑truth label (safe, unsafe, or insufficient‑info). Experiments show that providing safety rules improves model accuracy, while structured‑rationale prompting yields mixed results, indicating that current models cannot reliably assess operation safety.
DeepSafe‑SciHazard introduces a real‑world‑grounded benchmark for measuring scientific safety risks, comprising 2,400 hazardous and 600 oversafety questions across 12 disciplines. It defines a decomposed harm scoring system, DeHarm‑Score, that evaluates query severity, refusal behavior, and response‑level risk, further breaking down harm into executability and net‑new risk. An expert‑validation study shows DeHarm‑Score aligns 90.17% better with expert judgments than the best baseline, and the benchmark reveals that deep research agents score 32.3% higher on mean DeHarm‑Score than standard LLMs, highlighting a critical blind spot in current safety defenses.
arXiv:2610.28381v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning about safety is essential for embodied agents powered by large language models (LLMs). We introduce the Contextual Action and Plan Safety b...
arXiv:2610.31713v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advances in Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) have enabled increasingly seamless human-AI interaction, but their unified processing of heterog...
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly support science, but they can also convert hazardous scientific knowledge into actionable misuse guidance. Existing benchmarks often rely on templated queries disconnected from real-world hazards, and employ LLM-as-a-Judge paradigms without domain grounding.
arXiv:2608. 12025v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical devices are becoming more software-intensive, connected, and AI-enabled.
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) large-scale deployment in industrial warehouse settings specifically necessitates that models exhibit human-expert-level hazard-oriented perception, understanding, and r...
arXiv:2608. 04697v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Operational hazard analysis of aviation system operations must consider interactions among weather, ATC actions, airspace constraints, aircraft operations, and human factors - distinct from the functional hazard assessment applied at the aircraft-system level.
arXiv:2604. 02022v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluating the safety of LLM-based agents is increasingly important because risks in realistic deployments often emerge over multi-step interactions rather than isolated prompts or final responses.
LogiScope‑VQA is a new benchmark dataset for evaluating vision‑language models in logistics hazard identification. It contains 2,476 images, 2,918 videos, and 10,274 VQA pairs drawn from real industrial warehouses, covering 18 core objects and 20 risk types across 39 subtasks. Experiments show that even advanced proprietary models lag behind human experts, highlighting a significant gap in perception, understanding, and reasoning for industrial safety.
arXiv:2602.03100v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents that operate in real-world environments, introducing safety risks beyond linguisti...