arXiv AI By Chunxiao Li, Yuan Xiong, Lijun Li, Tianyi Du, Wenlong Zhang, Lei Bai, Jing Shao

DeepSafe-SciHazard: A Benchmark for Measuring Scientific Safety Risks with Decomposed Harm Scoring

Read the original on arXiv AI →

DeepSafe‑SciHazard introduces a real‑world‑grounded benchmark for measuring scientific safety risks, comprising 2,400 hazardous and 600 oversafety questions across 12 disciplines. It defines a decomposed harm scoring system, DeHarm‑Score, that evaluates query severity, refusal behavior, and response‑level risk, further breaking down harm into executability and net‑new risk. An expert‑validation study shows DeHarm‑Score aligns 90.17% better with expert judgments than the best baseline, and the benchmark reveals that deep research agents score 32.3% higher on mean DeHarm‑Score than standard LLMs, highlighting a critical blind spot in current safety defenses.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 18

SciRisk-Bench: A Risk-Dimension-Aware Benchmark for AI4Science Safety

arXiv:2606. 18936v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in AI for Science (AI4Science) workflows, from scientific question answering and literature analysis to laboratory planning and autonomous discovery.

By Linghao Feng, Yinqian Sun, Dongqi Liang, Sicheng Shen, Chenfei Yan, Yuxuan Peng, Yilin Zhao, Haibo Tong, Kai Li, FeiFei Zhao, Yi Zeng
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 17

SciRisk-Bench: A Risk-Dimension-Aware Benchmark for AI4Science Safety

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in AI for Science (AI4Science) workflows, from scientific question answering and literature analysis to laboratory planning and autonomous discovery. This progress creates an urgent need for safety benchmarks that evaluate not only scientific competence, but also whether models recognize and avoid risks in high-stakes scientific contexts.

arXiv AI
Oct 12

DRYLAB-Bench: Benchmarking the Biosecurity Risk of Agentic LLM Mutation Design

DRYLAB‑Bench is a new benchmark that measures the biosecurity risk of large language models (LLMs) when they design biological mutations. It presents 30 hazardous mutation‑design scenarios and evaluates LLMs in a multi‑round, tool‑augmented setting, scoring designs against 187,695 empirical wet‑lab measurements using a Biosecurity Risk Score. Initial tests on 15 frontier models show that even without tools, a majority of designs exceed average risk, and tool use further amplifies the threat.

By Yuzhen Wang, Chunxiao Li, Baichen Le, Lewen Yan, Jie Zhang, Yucheng T. Yang, Xing-Ming Zhao, Lijun Li, Jing Shao