arXiv Machine Learning

Efficient Adjoint Matching for Fine-tuning Diffusion Models

Efficient Adjoint Matching (EAM) is a new method for reward fine‑tuning of pretrained diffusion models that reduces computational cost by reformulating the stochastic optimal control problem with a linear base drift and a modified terminal cost. This change eliminates the need for extensive stochastic simulation of full generative trajectories and backward ODE simulation of the adjoint state, allowing training‑time sampling with a few‑step deterministic ODE solver and a closed‑form adjoint solution. On standard text‑to‑image reward fine‑tuning benchmarks, EAM converges up to four times faster than the previous Adjoint Matching approach while matching or surpassing it on metrics such as PickScore, ImageReward, HPSv2.1, CLIPScore, and Aesthetics.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 10

Exploring the Design Space of Reward Backpropagation for Flow Matching

arXiv:2606. 11075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning text-to-image flow matching models with human preferences via direct reward backpropagation is sample-efficient but hampered by two well-known pathologies: activations cannot be stored across the full sampling trajectory at modern model scale, and chained Jacobian products across steps inflate the reward gradient as it travels back to early indices.

By Ruoyu Wang, Boye Niu, Xiangxin Zhou, Yushi Huang, Tongliang Liu, Chi Zhang
arXiv AI
Jul 1

Finite Difference Flow Optimization for RL Post-Training of Text-to-Image Models

arXiv:2603. 12893v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a standard technique for post-training diffusion-based image synthesis models, as it enables learning from reward signals to explicitly improve desirable aspects such as image quality and prompt alignment.

By David McAllister, Miika Aittala, Tero Karras, Janne Hellsten, Angjoo Kanazawa, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Drifting Preference Optimization for One-Step Generative Models

arXiv:2606. 02521v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: One-step text-to-image generators are attractive for deployment because they generate an image with a single forward pass, but preference finetuning them remains difficult: standard alignment methods often rely on policy likelihoods, denoising trajectories, differentiable reward gradients, or test-time optimization.

By Zhou Jiang, Yandong Wen, Zhen Liu
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

Step Back to Move Forward: Reflection-Aware Preference Optimization for Visual Generation

The paper introduces Reflection-Aware GRPO (RA‑GRPO), a reinforcement‑learning framework that aligns diffusion generative models with human preferences. It uses Diffusion Reflection to correct intermediate sampling paths by reversing the diffusion process, and Counterfactual Path Synthesis to embed these corrected trajectories into the policy, avoiding extra inference cost. Experiments on text‑to‑image and text‑to‑video models show RA‑GRPO outperforms existing methods, reducing reward hacking and improving generalization while remaining architecture‑agnostic.

By Junlong Wu, Jiuzhou Lin, Jia Sun, Boheng Zhang, Huaiqing Wang, Dewen Fan, Houde Liu, Qianqian Gan, Fan Yang, Tingting Gao
arXiv AI
Oct 1

CAST: Causal Advantage-Structured Training with Spatially Grounded Compositional Rewards for Diffusion Models

CAST introduces a reinforcement‑learning fine‑tuning framework for diffusion models that addresses three key limitations: it automatically selects the denoising window based on each model’s trajectory, decomposes prompts into verifiable semantic atoms via Causal Scene Graphs, and applies atom‑level rewards spatially weighted in the policy objective. The method is applied to FLUX.2‑dev and Qwen‑Image‑2512, yielding up to 3.07× improvement on the hardest GenEval 2 prompts compared with Flow‑GRPO while also enhancing overall generation quality.

By Shu Yu, Chaochao Lu
arXiv AI
Oct 27

VaLoP: Value Gradient Lookahead and Pullback for Reward-Guided Diffusion

VaLoP introduces a new method for reward-guided diffusion called Value Gradient Lookahead and Pullback, which evaluates the value function at a less noisy state and pulls its gradient back to the current state to reduce posterior covariance errors. The approach unifies two common gradient estimators and adds a correction term computed with a single vector-Jacobian product, while VaLoP‑Fast amortizes this correction with a lightweight head trained on a single reward. Experiments across multiple models, rewards, and datasets show that both variants consistently outperform existing value‑gradient guidance, and VaLoP‑Fast achieves the highest success rates on robot policy benchmarks such as LIBERO and RoboCasa.

By Kwanyoung Kim
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Beyond Pairwise Preferences: Listwise Reward-Aware Alignment for Diffusion Models

The paper introduces Diffusion LAIR, a listwise preference optimization technique that leverages continuous reward scores instead of binary pairwise comparisons to align text‑to‑image diffusion models. LAIR transforms reward scores into centered advantage weights and optimizes an advantage‑weighted regression objective on an implicit reward defined by denoising‑loss improvement over a reference model, with a quadratic penalty to regulate reward magnitude. Experiments demonstrate that Diffusion LAIR surpasses strong baseline methods on SD1.5 and SDXL across generation, compositional, and editing tasks.

By Austin Wang, Jiaqi Han, Stefano Ermon, Yisong Yue
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

Noise-Space Reward Alignment for Few-Step Generative Models

The paper introduces Noise Policy Optimization (NPO), a method for aligning few-step generative models with black-box reward signals. NPO learns an amortized flow policy that transforms initial Gaussian noise into a reward-tilted distribution, allowing the pretrained generator to produce higher-reward outputs without fine-tuning. The approach achieves superior reward-quality trade-offs across image, language, and protein generation tasks while drastically reducing inference cost compared to test-time search methods.

By Woocheol Shin, Taeyoung Yun, Jiwon Sung, Hyeongyu Kang, Jeongmin Park, Jaewoo Lee, Kyuil Sim, Dohyun Kim, Yutong He, Jinkyoo Park