The paper introduces a sequential activation patching framework to study how Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting influences large language models over multiple generated tokens. By tracking CoT-conditioned attention-head activations across token positions and aggregating them with Part-of-Speech guidance, the authors identify distributed head sets that jointly contribute to answer generation. Targeted zero-ablation experiments confirm that these heads are functionally important, affecting mechanisms such as reasoning-trajectory maintenance, answer anchoring, exemplar-target separation, and numerical generation.
arXiv:2604.23351v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Whether intermediate reasoning is computationally useful or merely explanatory depends on whether chain-of-thought (CoT) tokens contain task-...
arXiv:2510. 13554v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The reasoning pattern of Large language models (LLMs) remains opaque, and reinforcement learning (RL) typically applies uniform credit across an entire generation, blurring the distinction between pivotal and routine steps.
The paper introduces COMPASS, an inference-time steering technique that enhances large language model performance on mathematical reasoning tasks. By using the correctness of a model’s direct answer attempts as a latent signal, COMPASS identifies a small subset of attention heads whose activations can be steered to elicit reasoning. Experiments across three model families and multiple math benchmarks show that COMPASS improves GSM8K accuracy by an average of 16 percentage points and achieves near Chain‑of‑Thought performance while generating 20–70% fewer tokens.
The paper investigates a training‑free early‑exit technique that inserts an end‑of‑think (EoT) token to terminate chain‑of‑thought (CoT) reasoning in large reasoning models. It finds that the injected EoT often fails to cleanly switch the model from reasoning to answering, leading to continued reasoning‑like generation—termed spurious CoT termination—whose length scales with the amount of reasoning saved. By increasing attention to the EoT token through Exit‑token Attention Biasing (EAB), the authors reduce spurious termination and shorten the answering phase across multiple models and benchmarks.
arXiv:2603. 01437v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As chain of thought (CoT) has become central to scaling reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs), it has also emerged as a promising tool for interpretability, suggesting the opportunity to understand model decisions through verbalized reasoning.
arXiv:2608.31066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning improves multi-step problem solving, but long reasoning traces inflate inference cost. Token-level CoT compression red...
arXiv:2606. 13603v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is the dominant paradigm for inference-time scaling in language models, yet the causal influence of individual steps on the final answer poorly understood.
The paper investigates how different forms of compressed chain‑of‑thought (CoT) reasoning—Explicit, Composed, and Implicit—affect large language model (LLM) performance after supervised fine‑tuning (SFT). Using a synthetic compositional reasoning task, the authors show that coarser CoT requires more SFT data, that Composed and Implicit CoT benefit more from data scaling (with Composed also benefiting from repetition), and that reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can decompose compressed steps learned during SFT. Additionally, unidirectional CoT ordering improves generalization on longer sequential tasks.
arXiv:2604. 06374v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Latent reasoning via continuous chain-of-thoughts (Latent CoT) has emerged as a promising alternative to discrete CoT reasoning.
arXiv:2604. 08571v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve high performance on standard mathematical benchmarks, their problem-solving abilities depend on the context and textual formatting.
The paper introduces LIRSeg, a method that replaces explicit Chain-of-Thought reasoning in multimodal large language models with a compact set of learnable latent tokens for reasoning segmentation. LIRSeg is trained in two stages—spatial alignment and GRPO—while employing extreme-advantage sampling, decoupled exploration-stability updates, and latent diversity amplification to enhance token informativeness. Experiments show that LIRSeg improves segmentation accuracy and reasoning efficiency, achieving significant gIoU gains over the VisionReasoner baseline and reducing reasoning tokens by about 16×.
AURAL is a speech language model that performs adaptive latent reasoning by modeling multiple plausible reasoning continuations in latent space and jointly predicting chunks of future states, thereby reducing sequential forward passes and latency. The authors introduce a large bilingual dataset, AuralReason-683K, containing concise chain‑of‑thought annotations for emotion recognition, empathetic dialogue, and general reasoning, and use reinforcement learning (AURAL‑RL) to reward concise, high‑quality reasoning that adapts to problem difficulty. Experiments on two backbones show that AURAL‑RL matches or exceeds chain‑of‑thought reinforcement learning while achieving significant latency reductions, such as an 11.8× speed‑up on Qwen2.5‑Omni. "whyItMatters":"The work demonstrates that latent reasoning can match the performance of explicit chain‑of‑thought methods while dramatically cutting response time, addressing the trade‑off between intelligence and speed in speech language models."