arXiv AI

Asking the Right Questions: Ontology-Grounded Interpretable Embeddings for Biomedical Text

arXiv AI
Jul 15

CANDI: Contextual Alignment for Niche Domains Question Answering

arXiv:2607. 11891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The deployment of large language models (LLMs) in specialized domains like medical diagnostics and financial advisory necessitates evaluating capabilities beyond general knowledge.

By Megha Chakraborty, Darssan L. Eswaramoorthi, Het Riteshkumar Shah, Madhur Thareja, Michelle A Ihetu, Harshul Raj Surana, Kaushik Roy, Amit Sheth
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 6

Neighborhood-Aware Dual Biomedical Entity Linking

arXiv:2608. 04144v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Biomedical entity linking grounds mentions in clinical and scientific text to entities in a curated knowledge base (KB) with ontological structure, which supports downstream applications such as literature-scale information extraction and patient-record normalization.

By Yicheng Tao, Jie Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 3

BioELX: Context-Aware Cross-lingual Biomedical Entity Linking without Task-Specific Supervision

BioELX is a retrieve‑rerank framework for cross‑lingual biomedical entity linking that tackles two key problems: the English‑biased UMLS alias training data and the degradation caused by naïvely adding context. It fine‑tunes SapBERT_multi with Wikidata‑derived cross‑lingual alias supervision to create shared concept neighborhoods, and then reranks candidates using pretrained LLMs with mention‑anchored prompting to focus on the target mention. Experiments demonstrate state‑of‑the‑art performance on four benchmarks, improving Recall@1 by 4.8–18.2 percentage points without task‑specific annotations.

By Yi Wang, Corina Dima, Liangyu Zhong, Steffen Staab
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 24

Granuscore: A Reference-Free Measure of Granularity for Text Analysis and Question Answering

Granuscore is a reference‑free metric that measures the granularity of text by exploiting the structure of a hierarchical embedding space. It successfully reproduces known hierarchical orderings on the Granola‑EQ dataset, distinguishes granularity across different discourse contexts, and explains sentence‑specificity variations beyond sentence length. The authors also apply Granuscore to four question‑answering benchmarks, revealing systematic differences in granularity among questions, gold answers, and model outputs, thereby offering a new lens for assessing QA dataset difficulty.

By Lukas Ellinger, Alexander Fichtl, Miriam Ansch\"utz, Georg Groh
arXiv AI
3d ago

Overview of BioASQ 2026: The fourteenth BioASQ Challenge on Large-Scale Biomedical Semantic Indexing and Question Answering

arXiv:2609.39975v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper presents an overview of the fourteenth edition of the BioASQ challenge, organized in the context of the Conference and Labs of the Evaluat...

By Anastasios Nentidis, Georgios Katsimpras, Anastasia Krithara, Martin Krallinger, Miguel Rodr\'iguez-Ortega, Eduard Rodriguez-L\'opez, Natalia Loukachevitch, Igor Rozhkov, Elena Tutubalina, Dimitris Dimitriadis, Vasiliki Patsiou, Grigorios Tsoumakas, George Giannakoulas, Alexandra Bekiaridou, Athanasios Samaras, Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Nicola Ferro, Stefano Marchesin, Marco Martinelli, Gianmaria Silvello, Georgios Paliouras
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 24

Generative Embedding Benchmark: How Much Information Survives in a Dense Embedding?

The paper introduces the Generative Embedding Benchmark (GEB), which evaluates how much content from an embedding can be recovered by a decoder that only has access to the frozen embedding and a question, without the original image or intermediate features. GEB uses a curated visual‑question‑answering dataset with 1,800 development and 900 test items covering natural images, scene text, and visual documents. Experiments on seven public embedding models show that visual‑only scores range from 28.25 to 33.21, while joint image‑question encoding boosts scores up to 65.56, revealing that generative readout uncovers information bottlenecks not captured by traditional separability‑based benchmarks.

By Yun Li, Biao Yang, Peixi Wu, Yunhao Zhou, Mingzhou Jiang, Wei Yuan, Fan Yang, Wenwu Ou