Subtract or Replay? Exact Deletion from Language-Model Memory
arXiv:2607. 27539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Exact deletion from persistent language-model memory depends on how that memory represents a record.
arXiv:2607. 27539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Exact deletion from persistent language-model memory depends on how that memory represents a record.
arXiv:2607. 27539v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Exact deletion from persistent language-model memory depends on whether a record's effect remains addressable after later computation.
This paper introduces a deletion interface for a pretrained language model, measuring how effectively deleted records are removed from the model’s memory. By retrofitting a support‑vector memory gate into the global attention layers of a frozen Gemma 3, the authors show that deletions can be performed without altering weights and that the resulting state is close to a reference state that never stored the record. Experiments on 4B‑parameter models demonstrate low perplexity impact and strong evidence that deleted content is hard to recover, while larger or smaller models fail to achieve the same guarantees.
arXiv:2609. 04875v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-running LLM agents are stateful: beyond the transcript they accrete compressed summaries, plaintext memory, pending tool plans, and, under every serving API, a KV cache.
arXiv:2607. 12204v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Attention can be viewed as an online learner over context, yet existing test-time memories cannot certify that dropping a token leaves outputs unchanged or delete its influence outright.
arXiv:2608.30376v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recurrent, attention-free sequence models share a structural weakness: a fading state cannot perform exact recall of something seen once, far in the...
A language model's memory can be worse than having no memory at all. Give a model a memory that kept a wrong conclusion but dropped the work behind it, and it emits that stale value as a confident answer; give the same model an empty memory and it abstains.
arXiv:2607. 12204v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Auditable memory requires a precise contract: which output is preserved, relative to which reference solve, and across which updates.
arXiv:2607. 24667v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A language model with a bounded working memory must repeatedly decide which stored items to keep.
arXiv:2608.30427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speculative decoding speeds up generation with an efficient draft model (drafter) that proposes tokens for a target model to verify in one pass, pres...
TwinKV is a training‑free, attention‑free repair pass that identifies and swaps orphaned and redundant tokens in a KV cache, improving long‑context inference for small models. It works by detecting near‑duplicate keys and can be composed with existing eviction policies without altering their scoring rules. Experiments on Qwen3‑4B and Llama‑3.2‑1B across LongBench, LooGLE, RULER, and MMLU‑Pro show that TwinKV consistently improves performance for most configurations, especially at tighter compression ratios.
arXiv:2607. 23693v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon agents increasingly reuse their KV cache as memory: a serving system keeps a subset of cached entries and drops the rest.