arXiv Machine Learning By Vishwajith Ramesh

Subtract, Transport, or Replay? Auditable Deletion from Language-Model Memory

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 27539v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Exact deletion from persistent language-model memory depends on whether a record's effect remains addressable after later computation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

LatentPort: Beyond KV Cache - Cross-Model Transfer of Recurrent Memory in Hybrid Language Models: A 4B-to-9B Hybrid-State Handoff Without Target Prefix Replay

The paper introduces LatentPort, a method that allows a language model to transfer its live memory to another model without requiring the receiver to reread the context. Experiments on a Qwen3.5 4B-to-9B sibling pair show that adding a Gated DeltaNet (GDN) persistent-state package reduces negative log‑likelihood by 0.747 nats/token and improves performance across 64 PG19 documents. The study also demonstrates that direct recurrent and convolution reuse outperforms learned GDN maps, and a 434,176‑parameter correction further narrows the performance gap to the native 9B model.

By Simon P. Villani
arXiv AI
Aug 12

From Faulty Memories to Corrected Actions: Dependency-Guided Rollback Repair for Memory-Augmented Agents

arXiv:2608. 10502v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persistent memory lets language-model agents reuse information across sessions, but it also makes errors durable: a poisoned, stale, or misattributed record can alter reasoning, tool use, answers, and subsequent memory writes.

By Caili Yu, Yiqi Wang, Jiaqi Zhang, Yiqun Duan, Mingkai Zheng, Zhangkai Wu, Kaize Shi, Taotao Cai