arXiv:2608. 05188v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite ever-increasing sophistication in language model (LM) pre- and post-training pipelines, many important failures persist: models overcondition on user framing ("sycophancy"), exhibit incomplete logical generalization, and produce confident but incorrect responses.
By Itamar Pres, Belinda Z. Li, Laura Ruis, Zifan Carl Guo, Keya Hu, Mehul Damani, Isha Puri, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Jacob Andreas
arXiv:2602. 04718v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A central premise in mechanistic interpretability is that meaningful concepts in language models are represented by linear features in activation space.
By Moritz Miller, Florent Draye, Bernhard Sch\"olkopf
arXiv:2606. 30609v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used to interpret large language models by decomposing activations into sparse, human-understandable features, but scaling to large dictionaries exposes fundamental challenges.
By Haoran Jin, Xiting Wang, Shijie Ren, Hong Xie, Defu Lian
arXiv:2602. 04718v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A central premise in mechanistic interpretability is that meaningful concepts in language models are represented by linear features in activation space.
By Moritz Miller, Florent Draye, Bernhard Sch\"olkopf
The paper introduces On-Policy Self-Training, a method that allows large language models to improve themselves without external teachers or curated datasets. By generating its own question-answer pairs and privileged reasoning demonstrations guided only by coarse topic descriptions, the model creates a synthetic curriculum that enhances performance across multiple domains. Experiments show consistent self-improvement on both text and multimodal benchmarks, including Visual Question Answering, while preserving abilities on non-self-trained domains.
By Leon Sick, Lukas Hoyer, Yannick Str\"umpler, Christian Reisswig, Timo Ropinski, Federico Tombari
arXiv:2604. 13356v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mechanisms for continued self-improvement of language models without external supervision remain an open challenge.
By Shi Feng, Hanlin Zhang, Fan Nie, Sham Kakade, Yiling Chen
The paper investigates how different training strategies affect the prompt sensitivity of large language models. It reproduces and compares methods such as refined data construction and robustness objectives, finding that while robustness fine‑tuning improves over standard fine‑tuning and in‑context learning, the prompt gap remains large (40–57%). Notably, newer techniques like CoIN and PPCL often underperform a simple data‑construction approach that uses one template per batch, and diagnostics suggest that mixed‑template batches force the optimizer to reconcile conflicting updates rather than learn a prompt‑agnostic representation.
By Frederic Sadrieh, Michal \v{S}tef\'anik
arXiv:2607. 02460v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Post-training large language models (LLMs) without real-world interaction feedback or human-labeled supervision remains challenging, particularly in specialized domains where expert annotations are costly to obtain.
By Zhuowei Chen, Xiang Lorraine Li
arXiv:2606. 05173v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Masked language modelling (MLM) has been the dominant pre-training objective for text encoders since BERT, yet it encourages representations that are strongly anchored to surface-form token identity rather than deeper semantic structure.
By Aimen Boukhari
arXiv:2606. 08496v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have mitigated the opacity of large language models (LLMs) by decomposing dense representations into sparse features, explaining these features still remains a central challenge.
By Jingyi He, Haiyan Zhao, Ruxue Shi, Yanguang Liu, Xin Wang, Fei Sun, Mengnan Du
The paper proposes a self‑supervised framework that trains language models to predict concepts—sets of semantically equivalent tokens—rather than single tokens. This approach improves alignment with human similarity judgments, boosts performance on classification, clustering, and reranking tasks, and yields comparable or stronger downstream reasoning while lowering perplexity on semantically meaningful words and only slightly increasing overall perplexity.
By Christine Zhang, Dan Jurafsky, Chen Shani
arXiv:2607. 17558v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) offers a promising approach for training large language models without relying on a separate teacher model.
By Fan Yang, Rui Meng, Yuxin Wen