arXiv AI

Self-Improvement as Coherence Optimization: A Theoretical Account

The paper proposes that self‑improvement methods for language models—such as debate, bootstrap, and internal coherence maximization—can be unified under a framework called coherence optimization. This framework seeks a context‑to‑behavior mapping that is most compressible and jointly predictable, and the authors prove its equivalence to description‑length regularization. They further show that coherence regularization, when guided by a pretrained model prior, optimizes a lower bound on worst‑case accuracy for semi‑supervised learning, offering a theoretical explanation for the success of feedback‑free self‑improvement and predictions about its limits.

arXiv AI
Aug 7

Position: It's Time to Optimize LLMs for Self-Consistency

arXiv:2608. 05188v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite ever-increasing sophistication in language model (LM) pre- and post-training pipelines, many important failures persist: models overcondition on user framing ("sycophancy"), exhibit incomplete logical generalization, and produce confident but incorrect responses.

By Itamar Pres, Belinda Z. Li, Laura Ruis, Zifan Carl Guo, Keya Hu, Mehul Damani, Isha Puri, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Jacob Andreas
arXiv AI
4d ago

On-Policy Self-Training: Data-Free Self-Improvement in Large Language Models

The paper introduces On-Policy Self-Training, a method that allows large language models to improve themselves without external teachers or curated datasets. By generating its own question-answer pairs and privileged reasoning demonstrations guided only by coarse topic descriptions, the model creates a synthetic curriculum that enhances performance across multiple domains. Experiments show consistent self-improvement on both text and multimodal benchmarks, including Visual Question Answering, while preserving abilities on non-self-trained domains.

By Leon Sick, Lukas Hoyer, Yannick Str\"umpler, Christian Reisswig, Timo Ropinski, Federico Tombari
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Prompt-Robust Language Models: Which Training Strategies Work?

The paper investigates how different training strategies affect the prompt sensitivity of large language models. It reproduces and compares methods such as refined data construction and robustness objectives, finding that while robustness fine‑tuning improves over standard fine‑tuning and in‑context learning, the prompt gap remains large (40–57%). Notably, newer techniques like CoIN and PPCL often underperform a simple data‑construction approach that uses one template per batch, and diagnostics suggest that mixed‑template batches force the optimizer to reconcile conflicting updates rather than learn a prompt‑agnostic representation.

By Frederic Sadrieh, Michal \v{S}tef\'anik
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Learning Concepts, Not Tokens: Self-Supervised Semantic Alignment for Language Models

The paper proposes a self‑supervised framework that trains language models to predict concepts—sets of semantically equivalent tokens—rather than single tokens. This approach improves alignment with human similarity judgments, boosts performance on classification, clustering, and reranking tasks, and yields comparable or stronger downstream reasoning while lowering perplexity on semantically meaningful words and only slightly increasing overall perplexity.

By Christine Zhang, Dan Jurafsky, Chen Shani