The study evaluates large language models (LLMs) that generate political networks by comparing them to survey-reported partisan exposure from the ANES 2020–2022 Social Media Study. It finds that while network structure and political assortativity vary across model configurations, many models either over‑separate Democratic and Republican egos or underestimate Republican exposure, leading to group‑specific errors in local partisan environments. These discrepancies persist even among networks with similar aggregate properties, indicating that aggregate metrics alone can mask important individual‑level inaccuracies.
By Marco Tonin, Michele Tizzoni, Bruno Lepri, Luca Maria Aiello
arXiv:2608.29198v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly encourage users to disclose personal profiles for tailored assistance, measuring their political alignment...
By Li-Ni Fu, Chang-Chih Meng, Chien-Hua Chen, Hen-Hsen Huang, I-Chen Wu
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for election information, yet little is known about how external web content shapes the political information they present. Generative engine optimiz...
VoteGEO-Bench is a benchmark that examines how generative engine optimization (GEO) affects the visibility of election-related web content in large language model responses. It covers the 2024 U.S. presidential election and the 2026 Japanese House of Representatives election, using election queries, historical webpages, and voter personas. The study evaluates 11 rewriting strategies, finding that target‑specified rewrites and those that improve page organization or strengthen arguments increase exposure more than other tactics, while partisan identities can create larger baseline exposure gaps than a single rewritten page.
By Shiqi Zhang, Xiaokui Xiao
arXiv:2609.15207v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Generative AI writing assistants and the Large Language Models (LLMs) that power them are increasingly part of how voters gather information before ele...
By Bastiaan Bruinsma, Annika Fred\'en, Paul R\"ottger, Moa Johansson, Asad Sayeed
arXiv:2508.16013v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in politically sensitive contexts, raising concerns about their susceptibility to ideologica...
By Pietro Bernardelle, Stefano Civelli, Leon Fr\"ohling, Riccardo Lunardi, Kevin Roitero, Gianluca Demartini
arXiv:2603. 23841v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as primary sources of information, their potential for political bias may impact their objectivity.
By Rohan Khetan, Ashna Khetan
arXiv:2609.38256v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to answer questions about politically contentious issues, yet evaluations typically treat a model's...
By Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Michael Jacobs, Nils Metternich, Mirco Musolesi
arXiv:2607. 21842v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Research on political polarization on social media depends on the ability to reliably measure partisanship in user-generated content.
By Fathima Ameen, Christopher G. Healey
The paper investigates whether large language model (LLM) agents can simulate public deliberation by reflecting population opinion patterns and producing interaction-driven opinion change. Using census‑grounded Korean personas debating real policy questions, the study finds that persona agents fail to reliably reproduce population opinion patterns, often concentrating responses and reversing demographic differences. While deliberations generate reasoned, reciprocal arguments and some stance movement, much of this change occurs without peer exchange, and anchoring agents to population‑informed starting positions suppresses updating, indicating that population representation, argument generation, and interaction‑driven opinion change do not necessarily align.
By Chaemin Jang, Junsik Min, Jaewoo Choi, Donggyu Lee, Haiin Lee, Junyoung Park, Namhee Kim, Hyunwoo Kim, Jungwon Kim, Juho Kim, Nuri Kim, Jihee Kim
arXiv:2607. 15095v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The formation of political coalitions is a complex negotiation driven by both concrete policy objectives and deep-seated ideological convictions.
By Dylan Van Mulders, Matthias Bogaert, Dirk Van den Poel
arXiv:2608. 15871v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) trained on large-scale internet corpora encode extensive statistical regularities about social identities, attitudes, and political behaviour.
By Roman Neruda, Martin Bako\v{s}, Josef \v{S}lerka, V\'it Tu\v{c}ek, Petra Vidnerov\'a, Gabriela Kadlecov\'a