The paper introduces FADNet, a face authenticity detector that treats forgery detection as a one‑class classification problem, training only on authentic faces. It uses Evidential Deep Learning to measure uncertainty and a pseudo‑forgery generator to sharpen decision boundaries. Experiments on DF40 and ASFD show FADNet surpasses state‑of‑the‑art methods with 96.63% accuracy and 98.83% precision.
By Qingchao Jiang, Zhenxuan Hou, Zhiying Zhu, Zhenxing Qian, Xinpeng Zhang, Zaiwang Gu
The paper presents lightweight architectures for detecting GAN-generated synthetic faces, comparing a compact Swin Transformer, pre‑trained Swin‑Tiny and Swin‑Small models, and a hybrid EfficientNet‑B0 + Swin Transformer. Using the 140K Real and Fake Faces dataset, the hybrid model achieved 99% accuracy and 99.44% recall on 5,000 test images, outperforming both pure Swin variants and a CNN‑only baseline. The study demonstrates that combining hierarchical CNN features with shifted‑window self‑attention yields an efficient, computationally lightweight detection method.
By Sejuti Basu, Ashima Sood, Vijay Kumar, Sahil Sharma
FORGE is a forensic deepfake analysis system that provides region‑grounded natural language explanations for image manipulations. It addresses the inductive bias mismatch of multimodal large language models by adding a Vision‑Only Model trained on dense patch prediction, allowing the language model to interleave tokens with preserved spatial correspondence. Across face‑manipulated and fully synthetic content, FORGE delivers fine‑grained attribute queries and outperforms in‑domain baselines, with region‑specific evaluation and human studies confirming explanation faithfulness.
By Rohit Kundu, Shan Jia, Vishal Mohanty, Athula Balachandran, Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury
arXiv:2606. 30528v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current generative models, including GANs and diffusion models, have reached an outstanding level of photorealism, posing significant risks to privacy and security.
By Orazio Pontorno, Mattia Litrico, Luca Guarnera, Mario Valerio Giuffrida, Sebastiano Battiato
arXiv:2607. 16273v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In forensic environments, automated identification of perpetrators is difficult due to pose changes, changes in light, occlusion, and lack of labeled data.
By Savitha N J, Lata B T
arXiv:2606. 11505v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Biometric systems are increasingly deployed in security applications; however, they remain vulnerable to spoofing attacks, in which attackers exploit counterfeit biometric data to gain unauthorized access.
By Kumar Kartikey, Nikos Komninos
arXiv:2609.01511v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Face forgery detectors often achieve strong results on controlled benchmarks, but their reliability under realistic image degradations remains limited....
By Lucas Cunha, Lucas Sotomaior, Lucas Gasperin, Beatriz Caldas, Eduardo Pianovski, Rayson Laroca
The paper introduces the Deepfake Face Artifact Taxonomy (DFAT) and uses it to create both general-purpose and model-specific training materials for detecting deepfake face images. An online experiment with 524 participants tested detection accuracy across five generative models—three GANs, one diffusion model, and one multimodal large language model (GPT‑5)—showing that detection performance varies strongly by model and that model‑specific training yields greater gains than general training. A five‑month follow‑up with 342 participants revealed stable detection accuracy and no increase in perceived stress, suggesting the training’s durability.
By Zhiqing Guo, Lixin Jia, Luning Sun, Xiaowei Chen, Guofeng Yu, Liejun Wang, Gaobo Yang, David Stillwell, Thorsten Holz, Shujun Li
arXiv:2607. 14932v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Synthetic face datasets have become effective enough to train face recognition models with accuracy rivaling that of models trained on real photographs.
By Pawe{\l} Borsukiewicz, Daniele Lunghi, Wendk\^uuni C. Ou\'edraogo, Jacques Klein, Tegawend\'e F. Bissyand\'e
The paper introduces MoE-JEPA, a dual‑stream deepfake detection model that combines a V‑JEPA backbone with a Residual Mixture‑of‑Experts mechanism and a noise stream branch. It further incorporates a Gated Attention Multiple Instance Learning module to refine spatial semantic understanding. On the SID‑Set benchmark, MoE‑JEPA achieves a new state‑of‑the‑art accuracy of 95.54%, outperforming much larger models.
By Simone Teglia, Irene Amerini
This paper presents an interpretable deepfake detection framework that explicitly encodes physically grounded forensic cues to analyze spatially and temporally coherent facial features in video sequences. The method transforms videos into identity-consistent facial trajectories, segments them into fixed-length temporal windows, and represents each frame with 68 structured descriptors across photometric, textural, geometric, and compression domains. These descriptors are processed by an LSTM to capture temporal dependencies, achieving strong F1-scores on four benchmark datasets and demonstrating robust cross-dataset generalization.
By Chahira Benhama, Mohand Sa\"id Allili, Assia Hamadene
arXiv:2607. 06254v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deepfake image detection is currently served by three fundamentally different paradigms: commercial APIs, zero-shot vision-language models (LLMs), and open-source detectors.
By Sharayu N. Deshmukh, Md Rashidunnabi, Nelton Tiago Gemo, Kurundkar G. D., Mahamune M. R., Nilesh K. Deshmukh