arXiv AI

AI Economist Agent: An Agentic Framework for Model-Grounded Economic Analysis with RAG, Knowledge Graphs, and Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 20041v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose a model-grounded RAG-based AI economist with an agentic framework for economic scenario analysis using large language models (LLMs) and knowledge graphs.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

AI Economist Agent: An Agentic Framework for Evidence-Based Economic and Financial Analysis with RAG, Knowledge Graphs, and Large Language Models

The paper introduces an AI economist agent that integrates large language models, retrieval‑augmented generation, knowledge graphs, and quantitative models to conduct evidence‑based economic and financial scenario analysis. The framework orchestrates LLM agents to plan analyses, retrieve relevant evidence, and structure economic mechanisms, while registered quantitative models produce numerical outcomes and predefined tests validate intermediate results for inclusion in the final report. Applied to European macro‑financial stress scenarios and bank capital analysis, the empirical study demonstrates the agent’s ability to combine flexible evidence retrieval and scenario construction while maintaining traceability to sources and explicit model calculations.

By Masahiro Kato
arXiv AI
Jul 13

Augmenting Fundamental Analysis with Large Language Models: A RAG-Based System for Generating Investor Briefs

arXiv:2607. 09121v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this study, we examine the opportunities brought by Large Language Models (LLMs) to various aspects of fundamental analysis of companies based on their reports as well as data and documents describing macroeconomic situation like GDP and inflation changes as well as documents filled to the U.

By Bartosz Zi\'o{\l}ko, Kacper Dobrzeniewski
arXiv AI
3d ago

Reasoning Externalization for Faithful Large Language Model Narratives of Stock Return Predictions

The paper introduces a framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to generate natural‑language narratives explaining cross‑sectional stock return predictions. It combines temporal Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) from an XGBoost model with historical regime analogs to provide context. A controlled study shows that progressively externalizing numerical and relational reasoning improves evidence faithfulness and accuracy, while historical analogs boost human‑rated usefulness.

By Sujung Kim, Seung Hwan Cho, Sangjin Park, Young-Min Kim